It is a well-known fact that China’s economy is going through great structural changes. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which make up more than 99 percent of all Chinese companies, require a healthy operating environment and such an environment normally includes free entry to the market, fair competition, a mature and reasonable financial order, a sound legal system, transparent regulations and controls, as well as effective execution. However, for some time now the Chinese operating environment has placed major restrictions on the development of SMEs. In particular, these companies have been treated differently when it comes to financial assistance.
The interest rates on 62.3 percent of loans to SMEs are higher than the benchmark interest rate, while only 27.2 percent of large enterprises are subject to a higher rate. In addition, large enterprises receive more preferential loans. SMEs also tend to have less sound credit, which makes it difficult for them to obtain loans. Now that China is tightening access to credit, SMEs tend to be the first to have their loans put on hold by banks, compounding their already difficult situation.
The city of Wenzhou offers evidence of the difficult operating environment for Chinese SMEs. The tightening of China’s monetary policy and the strengthening of the yuan has led to a steady increase in costs. A survey conducted by the Bank of China branch in central Wenzhou found that the interest on loans issued by the city’s largest banks had increased by between 30 percent and 80 percent.
Bank loans may not be cheap, but only a minority of companies are able to get them anyway. Many of the companies that are not eligible for bank loans are forced to rely on private funding.
In the middle of this year, a few SMEs in Wenzhou experienced a disruption in capital flows and had to declare bankruptcy or close down. While the news that Three Flag Group — an old company from the cities of Wenzhou and Leqing — was on the verge of bankruptcy was still reverberating, a well-known food and beverage chain in Wenzhou closed because of its debt-related problems.
Judging from the situation in China, the manufacturing industry is clearly deteriorating. While it is true that this sector has been affected by the continued appreciation of the yuan, rising raw material prices, rising labor costs and the international financial crisis, the factor that has most directly undermined the manufacturing and -processing industries is the difficulty accessing capital as a result of financial controls and tightening credit.
On April 30, an article in the Chinese magazine Economic Review revealed that many Chinese SMEs are experiencing problems.
Rising costs have led to declining profits and many businesses facing a situation where stopping production will cause them to close, while continued production will lead to an even faster demise. Needless to say, a wave of SMEs are having to close.
One entrepreneur said that the biggest problems for Chinese SMEs is that: “Regardless of whether they are selling to the domestic market or for export, there is a clear shortage of orders and it is very common to see factories running at half capacity and making a loss. Even if they run at full capacity, they will not make any profits to speak of and everyone is doing all they can just to hold on.”
Last year, there were more than 10 million registered SMEs in China and the final value of their products and services was equal to about 60 percent of the GDP. They provided 80 percent of urban employment and their tax payments made up 50 percent of all tax revenue. SMEs are clearly vital to China’s economic and social stability, and the current wave of closures will undoubtedly have an impact on the nation.
Now there is increasing talk of the Chinese economy’s possible collapse. Not long ago, “Dr Doom” himself, renowned economist Nouriel Roubini, included China’s demise as one of four factors in a perfect storm. Even those who used to have a bullish outlook are now changing their tune.
Recently, the Mainland Affairs Council issued a warning that the Bank of China’s tightening financial policies have made it impossible for many SMEs to get a bank loan and China may be on the verge of a wave of business closures. Another negative influence is the real-estate bubble, which will have an impact on local finances. China is in for a hard landing.
If China’s economy really does collapse, contract manufacturers that have set up shop there will be the first to suffer. This includes many large Taiwanese electronics contract manufacturers, making it a certainty that trouble in China will have an impact on Taiwan. It seems that not only must Taiwan avoid relying too heavily on China, it must also keep its distance to stay safe. It is always best to rely on one’s self — Taiwan must focus first and foremost on strengthening its own economy.
Wu Hui-lin is a researcher at the Chung-hua Institution for Economic Research.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS