Given the types of images of Aborigines that are shown in the media, one would be led to believe that all they do is sing and dance in woven headpieces and loincloths. To believe that Aboriginal cultures are as simple as said portrayals would be foolish. Indeed, Aboriginal culture is far more complex and rich, and goes beyond these forms of entertainment.
As Taiwan has become increasingly multicultural, this country’s Aboriginal identity has been played up to such an extent that Aboriginal cultures have been cheapened to mere commodities in the eyes of local and national tourist bureaus and their homelands to “living museums.” What exactly are governments and organizations trying to accomplish when they propagate these sorts of images?
There is nothing wrong with highlighting Taiwan’s diversity, but most media coverage and tourism campaigns have reduced Aborigines to a spectacle of singers and dancers who don colorfully woven wardrobes that is not in the style of Western clothing — the marker of “modernity.” If they are not wearing elaborate traditional attire, they are half-naked. One understands that song and dance is a significant part of a number of Taiwan’s Aboriginal cultures, but it appears that it is the only aspect that the public seems to recognize as a representation of Aboriginal identity.
A recent announcement that the New Taipei City (新北市) Government is offering coupons and joint discount package tours to Wulai (烏來) and the recent round-the-clock coverage of Tao Aborigines rowing a balangay boat up the nation’s west coast from Orchid Island (蘭嶼) were just the latest in a long line of societal pigeonholing of Aborigines.
As New Taipei City Deputy Mayor Hsu Chih-chien (許志堅) put it during the announcement of the coupon promotion, “Wulai is a great attraction with its beautiful mountains, clear water and Aboriginal culture.”
Though not the first person to do this and most certainly not the last, Hsu’s statement reeks of neo-orientalism and turns the “other” into some kind of exotic novelty.
Meanwhile, the Central News Agency’s (CNA) video news segment on July 19 of the launching of the coupon program was quick to highlight the performance aspect of the Atayal, with the narrator predictably opening with the line, “singing and dancing,” telling prospective visitors what to expect when they are welcomed upon arriving in Wulai.
More of the same stereotypical coverage peppered CNA reports of the Tao balangay’s voyage, that began with the oarsmen “clad in their traditional loincloths” being greeted at each port of call with ... more dancing.
This trip was the idea of Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) and Lanyu Township Mayor Chiang Tuo-li (江多利) to publicize Orchid Island’s culture to the rest of Taiwan as part of the celebrations of the Republic of China centenary. With the extensive photo opportunities of scantily clad oarsmen, recalling imaginations of a “primitive” past, standing alongside “modern”-suited Han Chinese officials, one can imagine exactly how Tao, and Aboriginal cultures as a whole, are being represented.
This is certainly not the way — if there is any intention at all — for the dominant society to pull Aborigines out of their subjugated state. If Aborigines continue to be used as tools of various political or revenue--generating agendas then the government, and by extension the public at large, still have a long way to go in diminishing the perpetuation of these stereotypes.
A true effort should be made in educating the nation on the multifaceted cultural tapestries of the original inhabitants of this country.
Ted Chang is a copy editor at the Taipei Times.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.