The recent expansion of the tourism industry after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) swept to power in the wake of pan-green voters staying at home is becoming a canary in the mine shaft scenario.
Earlier this year, protests against hotel developments on Aboriginal land in Taitung came to the public’s attention. The reality of the nation’s tourism policy is revealing itself in areas along the Northeast Coast National Scenic Area that are being expropriated.
Government policies and rules ensuring Aboriginal land rights and the preservation of nature have been revealed to be completely useless and not worth the paper they were written on.
The increasing emphasis on tourism reflects the government’s agenda, demonstrating an increased reliance on tourism to maintain economic growth, which in turn achieves political goals.
Government decisionmakers are setting their sights on meeting the needs of the tourism industry, which is increasing the repetition of the mantra that Chinese tourism will be the nation’s savior. However, tourism has negative effects. One needs to only look at Hainan Island in China and Bali in Indonesia, where social ills brought about by the rapid development of the tourism industry are becoming increasingly obvious.
Taipei has traditionally used the rest of the country as its playground and has regularly used its clout as the capital to shape policy to its own agenda. Compounding this is the change of focus of the tourism industry now that its target customer is Chinese.
The nation’s tourism policy is purely about monetary objectives. The idea of developing better relations with China through tourism is unrealistic.
Furthermore, the development of tourism in Taiwan has done little to help Aborigines. A quick look at the history of domestic tourism and how the tourism industry’s previous attempts at development with respect to Aboriginal communities reveals much.
The Aboriginal “parks” constructed to “exhibit” Aboriginal culture to Taiwanese visitors during the past 20 or so years have done little to help these communities. The reality is that the country’s tourism policy has done more to expropriate the cultural features of Aboriginal identity by forcing it to conform, as a product, to its consumers’ expectations rather than ensuring the survival and vivacity of these dynamic cultures.
Policies that protect the environmental, cultural and public good do not really exist in Taiwan. Only legislation that expands the material interests of bureaucrats, politicians and an exclusive group of private interests exists.
The reality of what is happening on the east coast, in regards to policy, is that there will be an increase in political and administrative corruption cases as funds flow in and fatten the pockets of a select few. Legislation for the good of all Taiwanese is now being swept aside as cross-strait “relations” are developing “positively.”
This is not a good sign for Taiwanese society. It definitely makes it hard for the canary.
Philippe McKay is a graduate student at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
RSS