‘Idle-free’ is catching on
Two months ago I wrote a letter to this newspaper calling out for people to “support an idle-free Taipei” (Letter, May 17, page 8). I ended the letter with a plea to people out there that not only care, but also are proactive. Fortunately, some people contacted me and helped Idle-Free Taipei grow.
Since May, Idle-Free Taipei has grown from one person to nine contributing members. We have also started a Facebook group that has accumulated more than 700 members.
On July 3, Idle-Free Taipei hosted a “Clean Air Promotion” at the intersection of Keelung and Roosevelt roads. We sang songs about pollution, displayed posters with vital facts about vehicle exhaust and its adverse effects, distributed more than 800 information pamphlets and handed out almost 40 carbon dioxide masks to children and pregnant women.
We got a lot of huge smiles, thumbs ups and even instances where a whole section of waiting scooter operators applauded. The volunteers were also all smiles because they could see the immediate effects from their hard work. During one red light, we noticed an eerie silence, despite seeing a cluster of more than 20 scooters. When the traffic light ticked down to five seconds, all the scooters restarted their engines in unison, prompting us to high-five and hug each other.
After the amazing success of our Clean Air Promotion, the idea behind Idle-Free Taipei was submitted to a carbon-reducing contest hosted by the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Bureau of Energy. We took third place in the contest, which is an incredible honor that includes funding from the ministry.
In light of the success we have had, we are hosting another Clean Air Promotion on Saturday from 11am to 1pm. If you would like to be a part of an incredible event, or witness how a simple action can change the way people think, please join us.
We all deserve to breathe clean air.
JOHN FLECKENSTEIN
Taipei
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase