Opinion polls show the majority of people believe the indictment of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) to be a matter of political manipulation and persecution because Lee’s talk about “ousting Ma to save Taiwan” has threatened President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) chances at re-election.
The “oust Ma to save Taiwan” mantra hits straight at the heart of the matter. It has frightened Ma, who has resorted to the political persecution of Lee.
That Ma has issued this judicial threat makes it clear that he is trying to eliminate anyone who promotes a Taiwanese identity.
Lee’s slogan sounds familiar. In the early 1970s, the US started to change its policies toward China, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his entourage were kicked out of the UN and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) diplomacy collapsed.
The supporters of the traditional system of government lost momentum and Chiang’s son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) became premier, putting in place a policy of “implementing reform to protect Taiwan,” employing ethnic Taiwanese and carrying out what US diplomats referred to as “Taiwanization.”
With the “implementing reform to protect Taiwan” strategy up and running, Lee, at the time a technical specialist at the Sino-American Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction, was suddenly catapulted up several levels in the official ranks, and joined Chiang Ching-kuo’s Cabinet as a minister without portfolio.
It seems likely that Lee understood that this was linked to the political environment of the time and Chiang Ching-kuo’s efforts at “protecting Taiwan.”
Chiang Ching-kuo’s relying in “Taiwanization” to save Taiwan was criticized by his father’s former officials, who said it violated his father’s feudal idea that “gentlemen and thieves cannot coexist.”
However, movements to “save Taiwan” were, and still are, aimed precisely at stopping Taiwan from being swallowed up by “thieves.”
When Lee became president, he was even more active in carrying out democratization, localization and ending hostilities with China, and his interactions with China were based on the principle that Taiwan’s sovereignty and independence must not be harmed. The purpose was to “save Taiwan” and to make sure that it was not annexed by China.
After having experienced Chiang Ching-kuo’s attempts to save Taiwan through reform, Lee of course cannot agree with how Ma neglects consolidating a domestic consensus for democracy, human rights and the protection of Taiwan and instead does all he can to forge a “one China” consensus with China, which has greatly endangered Taiwan’s sovereign and independent status.
Chiang Kai-shek had no concept of democracy or nation and was fond of quoting ancient chancellor Zhu Geliang’s (諸葛亮) aforementioned saying about how “gentlemen and thieves cannot coexist.” Ma, who has received a modern democratic education, quotes the author of the centuries-old Chinese novel Romance of the Three Kingdoms, which says that “after a long split, a union will occur and after a long union, a split will occur.”
Ma is not committed to saving Taiwan and is more interested in accepting China’s “peaceful” annexation. The “oust Ma to save Taiwan” mantra is extremely powerful because it highlights how Ma has betrayed Chiang Ching-kuo, Lee and the vast majority of Taiwanese who are unwilling to see Taiwan annexed by China.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS