While most investors last week focused on the ongoing debt crisis in the eurozone and the standoff over the increase of the debt ceiling in the US, they should also be aware that Taiwan has its own fiscal problems.
The announcement by the Council for Economic Planning and Development on Monday that it approved a NT$216.6 billion (US$7.5 billion) budget for major public construction projects next year is an issue that deserves far more attention than it has so far received.
That number represents the lowest level in 10 years — and therefore a lower public spending contribution to the nation’s economy. In addition, the government’s budget office is reportedly only able to allot about NT$125.2 billion for top-priority projects, meaning that there will be a funding gap of NT$91.4 billion for public works next year, affecting about 96 percent of ongoing projects.
This funding gap for public construction projects did not occur overnight; it has happened almost every year for the past decade, but in the past the government always solved the problem by reallocating funds from its special budget to ensure the continuation of major infrastructure projects.
The importance of investing in infrastructure is self-evident: It creates jobs and drives up domestic investment in the short term, while developing opportunities for economic growth in the long term. Of the NT$216.6 billion budget for next year, transportation infrastructure projects account for about 53 percent, followed by agricultural projects at 9.3 percent and flood control and drainage plans at 6.7 percent, according to the council’s figures.
The funding gap for next year is raising concern because the government has already spent the four-year NT$500 billion special budget the Cabinet approved in 2009 to boost the slowing economy.
Like many other economies in the world, Taiwan adopted an aggressive fiscal policy to help stimulate economic growth during the post-global financial crisis era. By using funds from the special budget for a four-year NT$500 billion economic stimulus package, the government was able to allocate NT$369.3 billion for major infrastructure projects in 2009, NT$356 billion last year and NT$302.8 billion this year. Unfortunately, there is simply no money left for next year, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics.
While it is reasonable to expect the government to pull back from its aggressive fiscal policy with the economy likely to grow 5.06 percent this year, the extent to which it has slashed the public works budget is reason for concern.
The immediate downside risk to the nation is a lower contribution to GDP and attracting less foreign investment.
If the budget cut were to reflect an effort to implement conservative and prudent policies while maintaining fiscal discipline, then that would constitute a step in right direction, but the government needs to proceed cautiously.
However, if the true reason for such a big cut in the public works budget is that the government needs to fund its pay hike for civil servants amid rising public debt and declining tax revenues, the obvious answer would be to cancel the pay raise for civil servants and increase taxes on the wealthy. However, few lawmakers and government officials are likely to have the stomach for that ahead of presidential and legislative elections in January.
The government could take different approaches to fill the funding gap, such as accelerating the auction of state-owned land, cutting spending in other areas or seeking private money to finance public projects, but a fundamental solution to the problem ultimately depends on the much needed reforms of the nation’s distorted tax and fiscal system — which needs real action now, not cosmetic change designed to cover up political imperatives.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS