While most investors last week focused on the ongoing debt crisis in the eurozone and the standoff over the increase of the debt ceiling in the US, they should also be aware that Taiwan has its own fiscal problems.
The announcement by the Council for Economic Planning and Development on Monday that it approved a NT$216.6 billion (US$7.5 billion) budget for major public construction projects next year is an issue that deserves far more attention than it has so far received.
That number represents the lowest level in 10 years — and therefore a lower public spending contribution to the nation’s economy. In addition, the government’s budget office is reportedly only able to allot about NT$125.2 billion for top-priority projects, meaning that there will be a funding gap of NT$91.4 billion for public works next year, affecting about 96 percent of ongoing projects.
This funding gap for public construction projects did not occur overnight; it has happened almost every year for the past decade, but in the past the government always solved the problem by reallocating funds from its special budget to ensure the continuation of major infrastructure projects.
The importance of investing in infrastructure is self-evident: It creates jobs and drives up domestic investment in the short term, while developing opportunities for economic growth in the long term. Of the NT$216.6 billion budget for next year, transportation infrastructure projects account for about 53 percent, followed by agricultural projects at 9.3 percent and flood control and drainage plans at 6.7 percent, according to the council’s figures.
The funding gap for next year is raising concern because the government has already spent the four-year NT$500 billion special budget the Cabinet approved in 2009 to boost the slowing economy.
Like many other economies in the world, Taiwan adopted an aggressive fiscal policy to help stimulate economic growth during the post-global financial crisis era. By using funds from the special budget for a four-year NT$500 billion economic stimulus package, the government was able to allocate NT$369.3 billion for major infrastructure projects in 2009, NT$356 billion last year and NT$302.8 billion this year. Unfortunately, there is simply no money left for next year, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics.
While it is reasonable to expect the government to pull back from its aggressive fiscal policy with the economy likely to grow 5.06 percent this year, the extent to which it has slashed the public works budget is reason for concern.
The immediate downside risk to the nation is a lower contribution to GDP and attracting less foreign investment.
If the budget cut were to reflect an effort to implement conservative and prudent policies while maintaining fiscal discipline, then that would constitute a step in right direction, but the government needs to proceed cautiously.
However, if the true reason for such a big cut in the public works budget is that the government needs to fund its pay hike for civil servants amid rising public debt and declining tax revenues, the obvious answer would be to cancel the pay raise for civil servants and increase taxes on the wealthy. However, few lawmakers and government officials are likely to have the stomach for that ahead of presidential and legislative elections in January.
The government could take different approaches to fill the funding gap, such as accelerating the auction of state-owned land, cutting spending in other areas or seeking private money to finance public projects, but a fundamental solution to the problem ultimately depends on the much needed reforms of the nation’s distorted tax and fiscal system — which needs real action now, not cosmetic change designed to cover up political imperatives.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS