In 1987, before former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) enacted a policy allowing retired soldiers to return to China to visit relatives, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) secretary-general Lee Huan (李煥) sought out Robert Lai (賴義雄), a member of the dangwai (outside the party) movement, who was in Taipei at the time, for his opinion on the proposed policy.
Lai said that based on humanitarian principles, retired soldiers should be allowed to return to China to visit their relatives. The next day, a headline in a prominent “anti-communist” newspaper reported that an overseas dissident supported the policy.
It is quite obvious why the KMT decided to use endorsement of the policy by a well-known “dissident” as a selling point. However, this little vignette also highlights an important point: Even if Chiang was an unelected authoritarian ruler, he still wanted Taiwanese to trust him and worried that the policy would increase suspicions that he was selling out Taiwan.
Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), a former secretary to Chiang, talks about “no unification and no independence,” he holds his father’s dying words to “eventually unify” Taiwan with China close to his heart. He also accepts Beijing’s “one China” policy and treats the status of Taiwan as an internal Chinese affair as he struggles to improve cross-strait relations within the framework of the Chinese Civil War.
Ma received a Western education, but he ignores the fact that democracy is about responding to public opinion. He is a second-generation Mainlander, but he ignores the fact that Taiwanese are worried that a “foreign” elite is selling out Taiwan and blatantly disregards how his opinions tie Taiwan, over which Beijing does not have sovereignty, to China.
Some commentators have accused Ma of narcissism, stubbornness, shamelessness and arrogance to the point of his being ignorant and insensitive. Now that he is seeking re-election, Ma is dropping Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) in favor of a new running mate, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), because he thinks Wu has “a good way with words” and is full of “understanding and compassion for the public.”
Understanding people is nothing but the innate character of a kind person — it is not as rare as Ma might believe; indeed the streets are full of people who care for one another.
In addition, “having a good way with words” should mean the ability to communicate honestly with the public. However, Wu’s true talent lies in putting on a sincere face while avoiding difficult questions with cunning, downplaying serious issues, blaming everything on the pan-green camp, shirking responsibility and talking about policies in a way that the average person cannot comprehend, as was the case with his “grassroots economy.” These traits have not unreasonably given him a reputation for being a liar.
Ma has read the four Confucian classics, so he should know that Wu’s “way with words” is something Confucius disliked, as can be seen in the expression: “People fond of sweet talk or rhetoric are seldom benevolent or helpful.”
How can such a person be full of “understanding and compassion for the public”?
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), who was begged to stay on in his position, was quoted in an angry tone as saying that the pairing of Ma and Wu for the upcoming elections would be a “good mix.” Stubborn ignorance and insensitivity mixed with sweet talk and rhetoric are indeed a match made in heaven.
James Wang is a commentator based in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS