The recent sexual misconduct allegation involving an aide to Taiwan’s representative to Fiji no doubt came as a scandalous shock to many, rocking diplomatic circles and casting a negative light on his diplomatic duty, which is supposed to be to uphold and promote a positive image of Taiwan. The subsequent so-called punitive action meted out by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs comes across as equally shocking, to say the least. Handing First Secretary Leon Liu (劉壽軒) two mere demerits for “improper physical actions” seems to indicate a lack of seriousness at the ministry concerning a matter that has severely damaged the nation’s name and image.
While groping a female employee without her consent already constitutes severe misconduct, Liu offered the ridiculous excuse that he wanted to “investigate the breast shape of women from the South Pacific islands.”
Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添) said on Tuesday that he was truly saddened by the incident, pointing out that diplomatic officials are different from ordinary people in that they represent the country and that any misconduct would hurt the nation’s image and dignity.
Yang said he had decided to hand out “more severe” disciplinary measures for Liu over the matter. However, if giving Liu two demerits constitutes “more severe” disciplinary action in dealing with the matter, it would raise serious doubts over the standards the ministry has adopted in handing out disciplinary action.
As documents the Trade Mission of the Republic of China sent to the Republic of the Fiji Islands suggest the incident has been settled out of court with 5,000 Fijian dollars (US$2,840) paid to the local employee, this raises the question whether it was the result of Liu’s superior, Taiwan’s Representative to Fiji Victor Chin (秦日新), working to cover up Liu’s alleged escapades.
Adding more damage to Taiwan’s international reputation is the allegation against Chin himself, who, in addition to having been accused of misusing public funds, is alleged to have been having an affair with a Japanese woman who worked at the Japanese embassy in Fiji.
While Chin has flatly denied having an extramarital affair — the issue remains under investigation — the slew of alleged scandalous irregularities begs the question: What has gone wrong with the nation’s diplomatic workers?
Given Taiwan’s dire diplomatic situation as a result of China’s persisting obstruction, Taiwanese diplomats have their work cut out for them abroad and the hard work of many should not be overshadowed by the incidents that allegedly took place at the Fiji mission.
However, under President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “diplomatic truce,” in which Taipei no longer competes with Beijing for diplomatic allies, the allegations about what has been happening in Fiji seem to indicate that the nation’s public servants stationed abroad are being left with too much time on their hands with nothing better to do but fill their time with personal social affairs while on the taxpayers’ payroll. This could result in incompetent and despicable public servants — rather than those working toward improving bilateral relations — creating the lasting impression of Taiwan in the countries in which they are posted.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS