The recent sexual misconduct allegation involving an aide to Taiwan’s representative to Fiji no doubt came as a scandalous shock to many, rocking diplomatic circles and casting a negative light on his diplomatic duty, which is supposed to be to uphold and promote a positive image of Taiwan. The subsequent so-called punitive action meted out by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs comes across as equally shocking, to say the least. Handing First Secretary Leon Liu (劉壽軒) two mere demerits for “improper physical actions” seems to indicate a lack of seriousness at the ministry concerning a matter that has severely damaged the nation’s name and image.
While groping a female employee without her consent already constitutes severe misconduct, Liu offered the ridiculous excuse that he wanted to “investigate the breast shape of women from the South Pacific islands.”
Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添) said on Tuesday that he was truly saddened by the incident, pointing out that diplomatic officials are different from ordinary people in that they represent the country and that any misconduct would hurt the nation’s image and dignity.
Yang said he had decided to hand out “more severe” disciplinary measures for Liu over the matter. However, if giving Liu two demerits constitutes “more severe” disciplinary action in dealing with the matter, it would raise serious doubts over the standards the ministry has adopted in handing out disciplinary action.
As documents the Trade Mission of the Republic of China sent to the Republic of the Fiji Islands suggest the incident has been settled out of court with 5,000 Fijian dollars (US$2,840) paid to the local employee, this raises the question whether it was the result of Liu’s superior, Taiwan’s Representative to Fiji Victor Chin (秦日新), working to cover up Liu’s alleged escapades.
Adding more damage to Taiwan’s international reputation is the allegation against Chin himself, who, in addition to having been accused of misusing public funds, is alleged to have been having an affair with a Japanese woman who worked at the Japanese embassy in Fiji.
While Chin has flatly denied having an extramarital affair — the issue remains under investigation — the slew of alleged scandalous irregularities begs the question: What has gone wrong with the nation’s diplomatic workers?
Given Taiwan’s dire diplomatic situation as a result of China’s persisting obstruction, Taiwanese diplomats have their work cut out for them abroad and the hard work of many should not be overshadowed by the incidents that allegedly took place at the Fiji mission.
However, under President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “diplomatic truce,” in which Taipei no longer competes with Beijing for diplomatic allies, the allegations about what has been happening in Fiji seem to indicate that the nation’s public servants stationed abroad are being left with too much time on their hands with nothing better to do but fill their time with personal social affairs while on the taxpayers’ payroll. This could result in incompetent and despicable public servants — rather than those working toward improving bilateral relations — creating the lasting impression of Taiwan in the countries in which they are posted.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS