Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) finally announced the makeup of her presidential campaign team on Wednesday, after a month of drawn-out consultations and speculation. The team sees the return of many familiar faces from former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) era, a risky move given Tsai’s promise to cultivate new talent and the well-documented past rivalries between several of the DPP heavyweights she named to her team, and one that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is already trying to exploit to its own advantage.
Three former premiers — Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and Yu Shyi-kun (游錫堃) — all of whom jockeyed for position during the waning years of the Chen administration and have sought power ever since, make up the bulwark of Tsai’s team. They have been given a variety of impressive-sounding titles — campaign chairman, chief campaign commander, chief supervisor and fundraising chairman — making it difficult to distinguish who will be leading whom.
Chen alluded in one of his many posts from behind bars that the 2008 DPP campaign was doomed from the start because Hsieh and Su could never get along. However, they have now decided to work together to put Tsai in the Presidential Office, putting aside their issues for the greater goal of returning the DPP to power next year.
On the surface, it looks as though Su and Hsieh, who had a falling out after they were trounced by then-KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in the 2008 election, have put aside their differences to support Tsai in her bid for the presidency.
Tsai’s aides Wu Nai-jen (吳乃仁), who once served as DPP secretary-general and who represents the former New Wave faction, and DPP Secretary-General Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全) were also given top spots — chief director and executive director. Although the confusing array of titles leave one to wonder who is in charge of what, Wu is likely to be the most influential person behind the scenes, given his proximity to Tsai, while the others give a show of face to Su Tseng-chang, their boss and the proverbial queen-maker.
However, the makeup of Tsai’s campaign team suggests that the DPP has made a deliberate effort to highlight party unity ahead of everything else, even though that runs counter to a promise Tsai made to cultivate new talent.
KMT spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) jumped on this fact as soon as the team was announced, saying the lineup reflected the older generation of the DPP. If Tsai’s campaign is successful and the party regains the Presidential Office, she would be expected to reward her team with Cabinet positions. However, to do so would risk sending the message that the government is returning to the configuration of the Chen years.
Perhaps the biggest unanswered question is who Tsai’s running mate will be? Until recently, many had speculated that it would be Su Jia-chyuan, but his new appointment makes that less likely. Who, then? Is Tsai going to surprise us with somebody fresh or call on another face from the past?
Ma has already announced Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) as his running mate, which was no surprise. However, the choice of a running mate is just one of the campaign decisions Tsai needs to make, and make quickly. She is already more than a week behind, with her first campaign office still shuttered while Ma’s is up and running.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS