Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) finally announced the makeup of her presidential campaign team on Wednesday, after a month of drawn-out consultations and speculation. The team sees the return of many familiar faces from former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) era, a risky move given Tsai’s promise to cultivate new talent and the well-documented past rivalries between several of the DPP heavyweights she named to her team, and one that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is already trying to exploit to its own advantage.
Three former premiers — Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and Yu Shyi-kun (游錫堃) — all of whom jockeyed for position during the waning years of the Chen administration and have sought power ever since, make up the bulwark of Tsai’s team. They have been given a variety of impressive-sounding titles — campaign chairman, chief campaign commander, chief supervisor and fundraising chairman — making it difficult to distinguish who will be leading whom.
Chen alluded in one of his many posts from behind bars that the 2008 DPP campaign was doomed from the start because Hsieh and Su could never get along. However, they have now decided to work together to put Tsai in the Presidential Office, putting aside their issues for the greater goal of returning the DPP to power next year.
On the surface, it looks as though Su and Hsieh, who had a falling out after they were trounced by then-KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in the 2008 election, have put aside their differences to support Tsai in her bid for the presidency.
Tsai’s aides Wu Nai-jen (吳乃仁), who once served as DPP secretary-general and who represents the former New Wave faction, and DPP Secretary-General Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全) were also given top spots — chief director and executive director. Although the confusing array of titles leave one to wonder who is in charge of what, Wu is likely to be the most influential person behind the scenes, given his proximity to Tsai, while the others give a show of face to Su Tseng-chang, their boss and the proverbial queen-maker.
However, the makeup of Tsai’s campaign team suggests that the DPP has made a deliberate effort to highlight party unity ahead of everything else, even though that runs counter to a promise Tsai made to cultivate new talent.
KMT spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) jumped on this fact as soon as the team was announced, saying the lineup reflected the older generation of the DPP. If Tsai’s campaign is successful and the party regains the Presidential Office, she would be expected to reward her team with Cabinet positions. However, to do so would risk sending the message that the government is returning to the configuration of the Chen years.
Perhaps the biggest unanswered question is who Tsai’s running mate will be? Until recently, many had speculated that it would be Su Jia-chyuan, but his new appointment makes that less likely. Who, then? Is Tsai going to surprise us with somebody fresh or call on another face from the past?
Ma has already announced Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) as his running mate, which was no surprise. However, the choice of a running mate is just one of the campaign decisions Tsai needs to make, and make quickly. She is already more than a week behind, with her first campaign office still shuttered while Ma’s is up and running.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS