When the US government stopped recognizing the Republic of China’s (ROC) government--in-exile in 1979, members of the US Congress ardently drafted the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA). The TRA specifies that Taiwan shall be treated as a country and authorizes the sale of defensive arms and commercial and cultural exchanges with Taiwan to continue.
When former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was in power, he insisted on democratization and localization, and amended the Constitution to manifest the division between Taiwan and China. In rearranging the ROC, its territory was subsequently limited to the island of Taiwan, and the Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu archipelagos, and relinquished the old territorial claims of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). This was Taiwan’s stance. Whether the international community recognizes such claims is another matter entirely.
At the time when President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was in the US protesting then-US president Jimmy Carter’s recognition of the “communist bandits,” ie, the People’s Republic of China (PRC), waving an ROC flag and shouting slogans, he clearly understood that Taiwan was not part of China. However, he now accepts Taiwan as being part of China under the so-called “one China” policy, and consoles himself by saying that the ROC is that “one China,” refusing to see the PRC as a nation. However, Ma does not claim Taiwan is a nation, either.
After democratization and desinicization, the ROC was reborn and there are still reasons to advocate that the new nation has no connection to China. Ma is still stuck in the empty ROC described in the antiquated 1947 Constitution, a government-in-exile fit only to occupy Taiwan, and whose territory includes only the Kinmen and Matsu archipelagos.
Ma has used paid academics to concoct the doctrine of a “unified Taiwan,” in which the only remaining territories of the ROC, Kinmen and Matsu, were used to annex Taiwan and the Penghu Islands; however, the newly exposed visa regulations in US immigration policy maintain that Kinmen and Matsu are part of China’s Fujian Province, a merciless slap in the face for Ma.
As far as the US is concerned, Taiwan and Penghu’s sovereignty is still undecided, but that of Kinmen and Matsu incontrovertibly belongs to the PRC. From the Taiwan Strait crisis and the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty of the mid-1950s up to the TRA of 1979, the US always viewed Taiwan and Penghu on the one hand, and Kinmen and Matsu on the other, as two separate entities.
The TRA and any amendments made to US immigration laws regarding Taiwan have always treated Taiwan as a country, giving Taiwan an annual quota of 20,000 immigrants. Moreover, “Taiwan” is defined in the TRA as “the islands of Taiwan and the Pescadores [Penghu],” excluding Kinmen and Matsu.
Thus, those born in Kinmen or Matsu are considered Chinese, and they are not allowed to use Taiwan’s immigration quota.
By accepting the “one China” policy, Ma once again reduces the ROC to a government--in-exile that occupies Taiwan, which belongs to the Taiwanese, and Kinmen and Matsu, which belong to the PRC. Ma is simply digging the ROC’s grave: He does not advocate that there is an independent country on each side of the Taiwan Strait, and instead consoles himself with a “one China” policy, but who still sees the “Republic of China” as the “one China”?
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY KYLE JEFFCOAT
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS