Since first emerging in Tunisia, the “Jasmine Revolution” has faced much resistance, especially in Libya, Yemen and Syria. In China, too, any suggestion of a Jasmine Revolution has been met with severe suppression. In February, when the revolution had just started, Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi said he approved of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, claiming that the suppression of the student movement had been necessary. After two months of bombardment by NATO forces, Qaddafi remains resolute, refusing to step down or go into exile.
Despite frequent civil unrest and unprecedented levels of international pressure, China continues to suppress human rights supporters and dissidents, as well as Christian churches. It seems that neither the Libyan nor the Chinese totalitarian regime will just disappear, although it is likely the Libyan regime will fall first, owing to Western military intervention. China, on the other hand, has been intensifying the suppression of its people — starting with its strong objection to the human rights activist Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) winning the Nobel Peace Prize — fearing the spread of the nascent Jasmine Revolution of North Africa and the Middle East into China.
From April this year, the Beijing Shouwang Church has been holding services outdoors, persisting even though the Chinese government has responded by arresting worshipers every Sunday for the past seven weeks, and putting still more worshipers and preachers under house arrest. The church has refused to back down and the government has kept up its suppression. Similar treatment has been given to other churches throughout China, such as the Shanghai Wanbang Xuanbao Church, Guangzhou Liangren Church and the Early Rain Reformed Church in Chengdu.
The Shouwang Church began in 1993 as a bible study group of less than 10 people. By 2005, after merging with similar churches, it had expanded into a large church of a thousand members and began renting offices for meetings. In 2006, it applied for permission to establish a church, and the State Administration for Religious Affairs insisted that it obtain an official Three Self Church license. The church declined, wanting to maintain its independent status. After this, the government turned down its application and took action to suppress it, making sure that no one would rent the church members the premises they needed. On Nov. 1, 2009, the church held a get-together in a park, followed by a bigger outdoor service the week after. Nobody was arrested during this time because US President Barack Obama was visiting China at the time.
Later, when the church had purchased a property with funds it had raised itself, the government ensured that it did not receive the keys. The outcome of this was that, having nowhere to hold its services, the church members continued to congregate in outdoor locations and the authorities continued the arrests.
This is by no means an isolated case: There have been many examples of confrontation with the government recently, similar to these clashes with church groups, but by no means restricted to religion. The Mothers of Tiananmen — a group consisting of mothers of the student victims of the Tiananmen Square Massacre who are seeking recompense — for example, has been shunned by the government, and has had its progress hindered and its members detained. It is truly amazing that a totalitarian regime such as this has survived for as long as it has.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology.
TRANSLATED BY KATHERINE WEI
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS