In a recent celebration in Greater Tainan to mark the third anniversary of his presidency, Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) gave a speech in which he touted “human rights” as one of the three major achievements of his presidency. The other two were “sovereignty” and “environmental rights.” However, Ma’s rhetoric is clearly not backed by facts. Aside from signing two UN Human Rights Covenants into law, a token move, Ma’s presidency has no record of advancing human rights at home or abroad.
To the contrary, Ma’s presidency has been marred by incidents in which officials tried to restrict freedoms of expression and assembly. The incident where police beat up demonstrators and confiscated national flags and forcibly closed a record shop for playing Taiwanese folk music when Chinese official Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited Taiwan in November 2008 is still vivid in people’s memories.
Recently, a visit by another Chinese official, Sichuan Province Governor Jiang Jufeng (蔣巨峰), caused an equally outrageous incident at the Grand Hotel. Members of the Taiwan Friends of Tibet group had planned a press conference in a room at the hotel at the same time as a symposium promoting investment opportunities and tourism in Sichuan was taking place.
However, the Tibetan support group was told at the last minute that their reservation had been canceled. Members of the group were roughed up and forcibly removed from the lobby by the hotel staff when they protested this unfair and unreasonable treatment.
From the high-handed manner of the hotel staff during this incident, one suspects that their actions were sanctioned by officials of the Ma administration. The Tibetan support group wanted to call a press conference to focus attention on the extremely dire circumstances facing the monks in Kirti Monastery on the Tibetan Plateau at an elevation of 3,200m in the northwestern part of Sichuan.
Jiang has been responsible for the arrest of more than 300 monks from Kirti Monastery and he has placed the monastery under siege.
These two incidents illustrate that the Ma administration, in its over-eagerness to protect the sensibilities of Chinese officials, is, in effect, practicing a form of self-censorship by restricting Taiwanese freedoms of expression and assembly.
In all his interviews with the foreign press, Ma has always touted democracy as Taiwan’s greatest achievement. Ma has claimed that his engagement policy with China would help China democratize. What better way to show these Chinese officials the strength of a vibrant democracy than by exposing them to peaceful demonstrations with protesters holding colorful placards, wearing headbands and shouting slogans?
Instead of advancing human rights, the Ma administration is increasingly aligning itself with China in suppressing human rights and press freedom. Another recent event is -Chunghwa Telecom’s refusal to renew New Tang Dynasty Television’s lease for broadcasts to China on the grounds that it “does not have sufficient bandwidth.” This is yet another example of a “subtle” attempt by the Ma administration to please authorities in Beijing because the station is supported by members of Falun Gong, which is banned in China.
China is afraid of democracy blossoming in its land. The word “jasmine” has become a taboo word in China; even jasmine flowers are banned in the marketplace because of their association with the “Jasmine Revolution” in the Middle East and north Africa. If Ma is serious about advancing human rights and democracy, both in Taiwan and in China, he should be a man of his word and stand up for the fundamental principles of human rights, instead of just paying lip service.
Chen Mei-chin is a Washington-based commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS