Chiu Yi’s BS cocktail
Like many people who care about the state of Taiwan’s free press, I wonder how so many unsubstantiated claims can be spread by the media without qualification, explanation or apparently, investigation. I’m especially concerned that even the Taipei Times, arguably Asia’s best newspaper, isn’t immune to this phenomenon.
A recent case in point involves the vituperative Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅) who, according to the Taipei Times, had “been facing multiple slander suits for revealing scandals without offering proof” (“Chiu Yi found guilty of slander,” Jan. 20, 2008, page 2). According to a story last week, he “alleged that Tsai Ying-wen’s (蔡英文) had failed to apply to close the account given to retired civil servants” (“DPP officials deny bank claims,” May 17, page 3). However, the headline should have read “KMT legislator spews speculation” to match the story.
What is clearly needed in Taiwan is the equivalent of Media Matters for America or FactCheck.org in the US. Nearly everything Chiu says would be rated “pants on fire.” Readers should be reminded that this man has no credibility whatsoever — he makes Teacher Wang look like Albert Einstein.
Fair and balanced news reporting doesn’t mean interviewing the freaks on the extreme left and right fringes for their input on an issue. It means thoughtfully evaluating the veracity of information as well as its source. It’s a little embarrassing that some local papers just copy and paste the “info” from the KMT Web site as if it were true and independently verified.
Similarly, I was disappointed at the two above-the-fold stories on the front page late last month discussing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai ascent as Taiwan’s presidential hopeful (“DPP’s Tsai to run for president,” April 28, page 1).
In that article, Vincent Y. Chao (趙怡翔), reporting on the DPP side, wrote: “[Former premier] Su [Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌)]’s immediate endorsement of Tsai will likely alleviate some of the concerns that the primary would split the party.”
On the other hand, in a story on the same page, staff reporter Mo Yan-chih (莫彥芝) quotes KMT spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) as having said: “We are concerned about the negative campaign strategies used in the DPP’s presidential primary” (“KMT surprises nobody with Ma nomination,” April 28, page 1). This baseless factoid was reported on the front page, without any qualifiers, such as “asserted” or “claimed.”
Given that the four televised DPP presentations were described as “cordial,” “dull,” “too peaceful” and “plain, stiff, dull and banal” by observers and academics, I find Su Jin-pin’s assertion unjustifiable. Maybe not “pants on fire,” but clearly what he said was a misleading lie, geared at riling his supporters.
Elsewhere, I’ve seen Chiu described as a “muckraker,” a term which implies that the person is a whistleblower or an investigative journalist, which Chiu is clearly not, in his capacity as a malicious rumormonger. I hope Taiwan’s voters send him out of office so he can start serving all those prison sentences he’s been accumulating during his terms in the legislature.
And amid the anti-bullying sentiment I read about almost daily in the Taipei Times, I think these people should be named and shamed.
So I’m calling you out, Chiu Yi: You’re a bully. Back off, and cut the crap.
TORCH PRATT
Yonghe, New Taipei City
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
RSS