Wang Chao-hung (王超弘), also known as Teacher Wang of Puli (埔里), Nantou County, made news after predicting that a strong earthquake would strike on Wednesday last week. The story is reminiscent of that of David Koresh, the deceased leader of a religious sect in Waco, Texas, called the Branch Davidians, and the gunbattle between his group and US federal agents and subsequent siege that occurred in 1993. The apocalyptic Branch Davidians lived on an isolated ranch northeast of Waco, where Koresh was accused of dissolving marriages and having sex with female followers to propagate the “House of David.”
The Branch Davidians stockpiled arms and ammunition, and when agents from the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives raided their compound, the Davidians opened fire, resulting in the deaths of four agents and six Branch Davidians. The FBI then took over the standoff and after a 51-day siege, the compound’s buildings caught fire — some allege that fires were deliberately set — in a final assault to remove the sect members. Seventy-six of the followers died in the flames, including more than 20 children, two pregnant women and Koresh himself.
The First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech and religion, but a few governors in the southern US, including former US president Bill Clinton, then governor of Arkansas, tried to dissolve fanatically apocalyptic religious cults through both soft and harsh methods, such as moral persuasion and arrests. They perhaps did this because apocalyptic prophecies tend to corrupt people’s minds and endanger the legitimacy of government. In the couple hundred years since the founding of the US, the country has experienced a great deal of racist discourse, apocalyptic prophecies and endless political satire directed at politicians.
Racist discourse and apocalyptic prophecies have plagued the US, causing problems for the targets of discourse and the government. Political satire is protected by free speech laws, therefore most public personalities who try to sue those that parody them fail.
Taiwan’s young democracy is going through the same upheavals. Recently, authors have sued political TV shows in which they were parodied. Moreover, the Fan Lan-chin (范蘭欽) incident, in which former Toronto-based Government Information Office official Kuo Kuan-yin (郭冠英) expressed ethnic prejudice against Taiwanese under a pen name, was reminiscent of the sharp commentary of US political commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter. The prediction that Taiwan would be struck by a magnitude 14 earthquake on the morning of May 11 was similar to other doomsday prophecies. What ties all of these together is an issue little discussed in Taiwan, but very important to democratic development — freedom of expression.
How far does freedom of speech extend in pluralistic societies? If the discourse of one individual infringes on the dignity of another or if their religious discourse threatens civic order, a mature society will not only prescribe legal sanctions, but should also be prepared to reflect on the issue at hand.
Modern Taipei, for example, is home to many temples and people who promise to cure cancer, qigong masters and doomsday prophets. I find it difficult to understand how people with doctorates and white-collar professionals often follow these poorly educated “prophets.” It’s as if postcolonial Taiwan has been unable to develop a philosophical maturity. Many Taiwan residents have a good life in material terms, but this is accompanied by a rather impoverished mental life. This is perhaps why people are willing to accept specious and tautological discourses.
Karl Marx said that religion is “the opiate of the masses,” that it is a form of escapism.
Philosophical thought and art, these twin prescriptions for civilization and cultivation, are often neglected. It’s a shame, becauuse they can elevate society to heights that Taiwanese society continues to find elusive.
Perhaps we should reflect on why people are so easily sucked in by cheap doomsday prophecies that really have nothing to do with them in the first place or why public personalities are so preoccupied with the satirical TV shows that are so common in the West.
More importantly, shouldn’t people in Taiwan try to take advantage of freedom of speech to break through the noise and try to form some kind of cultural consensus? These are the issues that the media, who only add to the babble, and intellectuals who remain silent really should address.
Albert Shihyi Chiu is an assistant professor in Tunghai University’s Department of Political Science.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
RSS