Set in the foothills of the Himalayas, Dharamsala, India, is the seat of Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama and the headquarters for the eight Tibetan exile settlements throughout India. To establish their refugee status in India, each of the 180,000 Tibetans is given a personal audience with the Dalai Lama.
During the past decades, many young Tibetans, starved of their culture and facing repression by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), have trekked across the Himalayas to India. This process was anecdotally recorded in the moving documentary The Cry of the Snow Lion.
There in the Himalayas, the mountaineers witnessed the Chinese People’s Liberation Army intercept and murder a 17-year-old Tibetan woman in one of the groups that was fleeing across the snow from Tibet. This tragic process of defection was also illustrated to a delegation of Australians who recently met the Dalai Lama, by the 2,800 children living in boarding schools at Dharmasala’s Tibetan Children Village. Generations of Tibetan children, mainly aged six to 10, have been cared for and educated in the village. They are sent by their parents to India, often without the hope of seeing each other again.
Tibetans around the world have been agitated about the recent crackdown at the Kriti Monastery in Tibet, where Chinese authorities have enforced a “patriotic re-education campaign” and imposed an indefinite ban on religious activities. Three hundred monks have also been “removed.” On April 21, a large group of Tibetans stood guard at the monastery to prevent the Chinese forces from removing monks — the crowd was dispersed by the police, who used indiscriminate force. Two elderly Tibetans were beaten to death.
At Dharamsala, the Central Tibetan Administration attempts to replicate all the functions of a state. These functions include the Kashang (Tibetans’ elected parliament), a Tibetan education system, state archives, medical institutes and the Norblinka Institute of Art, where 400 sponsored artists maintain the traditions of their ancient culture.
As the Dalai Lama withdraws from front-line leadership (he is 75), Tibetans have a plan to ensure their immediate political future.
Regarding the election of a new Tibetan prime minister, the British newspaper the Guardian recently wrote: “Tibetans around the world have voted a Harvard law professor as their political leader, in the first election since the Dalai Lama, who is 75, announced that he would give up the political leadership of the Tibetan community in exile. The new prime minister, the 42-year old Lobsang Sangay, polled 27,051 votes, 55 percent of the total electorate, to beat two other secular candidates.”
Sangay was declared the third kalon tripa (prime minister). This is part of the wider Tibetan community’s plan to survive outside of Tibet when the Dali Lama dies.
The new kalon tripa has previously hinted he could move beyond the Dalai Lama’s “middle way” policy of negotiating with China for autonomy in Tibet.
As a student in New Delhi, he was a leader of the Tibetan Youth Congress, which champions complete Tibetan independence.
The Dalai Lama acknowledged to our delegation that his moderate “third way,” which sought Tibetan authority within a Chinese federation, had not been successful, but that the uprising in March 2008 showed the Chinese had to deal with “the issue.”
He told us that the crackdown at the Kriti Monastery may be part of Beijing’s fear about the implications of the “Jasmine Revolution” in the Middle East and that mistrust underlies the communist regime. The Dalai Lama claimed the Chinese budget for internal security was more than the budget for external security.
After the “disappearance” of the five-year-old Panchen Lama (the second-most important Tibetan religious figure) 15 years ago, the Chinese government now says it has to approve all reincarnations of living Buddhas or senior religious figures in Tibetan Buddhism, including the choice of the next Dalai Lama.
The Tibetan exiles expect that when the Dalai Lama dies, the Chinese will try to control the discovery of his successor so that the next Dalai Lama will be under Beijing’s control, as the Panchen Lama now is. The Tibetans’ plan to develop new forms of leadership outside Chinese control is designed to circumvent this.
Both the Tibetan institutions in Dharamsala and reinvigorated Tibetan political structure are part of the Tibetan exiles’ plans to outlast the Chinese occupation of Tibet. The Dalai Lama’s alternative plans for his successor as spiritual leader shows the old fox has a multilevel strategy to outlast the seemingly awesome power of the CCP.
Michael Danby is an Australian member of parliament.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with