Support an idle-free Taipei
One thing that everyone in Taipei can agree on is that there is too much air pollution caused by motor vehicles. Among those vehicles, scooters probably have the worst reputation and understandably so.
I have recently started a campaign directed at those who use their scooters to commute and seemingly will do so forever, regardless of improvements and expansions made to public transportation.
The name of the campaign is “Idle-Free Taipei,” and the mission is for drivers to turn off their scooter engines at all of those seemingly endless red lights that Taipei is notorious for. With the help of a friend, I found that this idea has already been discussed, even with the prospect that it might one day become a law.
For the past two months I have been driving all around Taipei during the morning and evening rush hours with a watch and a camera trying to get a better idea of how much idling occurs. I found that at a single traffic light, the cumulative stoppage for scooters can be up to, and even more than 80 minutes.
Taking precise notes of all my travels at different times and in different areas of the city, I also discovered that scooters stop at traffic lights at a very consistent average of 1.4 times per kilometer driven. In addition, the average time spent waiting at a traffic light is 63 seconds, which means that for every 1km driven, the typical scooter is idling for approximately 86 seconds (which averages to about 35 percent of the total commute time).
Once you take the number of scooters in Taipei and multiply it by the average commute distance, it is easy to see how much idling is really going on.
I did multiple trials with my own scooter and found that I burn 0.15 liters an hour by idling alone. If this is any indication of other scooters in Taipei, then scooter commuters are burning an obscene amount of fuel every minute, let alone every day.
There have been numerous myths created concerning idling, such as the myth that it takes more fuel to restart an engine. This has been disproven and it turns out that more 10 seconds of idling uses more fuel and causes more wear on the starter, battery, etc, than it would to restart the scooter.
Conveniently, the majority of traffic lights in Taipei let us know when we will be stopping for more than 10 seconds, which is the foundation for Idle-Free Taipei.
I am hoping to reach as many people as possible with this campaign. Our Web site, www.Idle-FreeTaipei.com, has facts in both Chinese and English, ideas and plenty of credible sources to back the claims. If there is anything that can be done to help promote this cause, it would be greatly appreciated.
JOHN FLECKENSTEIN
Taipei
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS