Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) recent selection as the party’s candidate for next year’s presidential election represents a generational transition and demonstrates how the DPP is improving itself and moving further away from the outdated and continuously regressing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The ideals of the new generation are not entirely removed from the previous generation of leaders, but it is more focused on how to attain its ideals. Their different experiences mean that the new generation has a different style from the revolutionaries and “individual heroes” of the previous generation.
The subject of Tsai’s actions is not “I,” but “we.” Tsai is not bragging about what “she” can do for the DPP or Taiwan; rather, she is saying let “us” work together and contribute to Taiwan.
The DPP elders all have a background in the democratization movement, which they joined after suffering injustices during the KMT’s authoritarian rule that must have left deep emotional scars. It is normal for individual heroes to appear in such opposition movements, but a democratic political party that wants to rule must rely on unity and work together for a common goal.
The main players from the democratization movement era lacked opportunities to deal with international affairs. While they are not totally lacking when it comes to understanding the complex international environment Taiwan finds itself in, the new generation has mostly received a Western education and has had firsthand experience of mature Western democracies. It is more familiar with the decision-making processes of democratic governments and is better equipped in its capacity of holding power and carrying out reform.
The DPP’s basic nature and the ideals and actions of its new generation offer a stark contrast to the actions of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT’s return to authoritarian leanings. The DPP emphasizes democracy and equality, while the KMT focuses on authority and domination.
The new generation of DPP leaders does not discriminate based on geographical location or gender and it is concerned with developing a society based on fair competition and looking after disadvantaged groups. Ma’s KMT, on the other hand, seems to be returning to its old Leninist ways.
The DPP has had a female vice president and now has a female presidential candidate, while the KMT continues to view women as mere decoration who are only there to meet quotas. The DPP nominated a presidential candidate based on fair competition, whereas Ma is the KMT’s only presidential candidate. The subject of nominating someone else was not even allowed to be discussed and all members of the KMT’s Central Standing Committee clapped their hands like children as they approved Ma’s nomination.
Ma’s party-state system is based on a concept of “me doing what I want” — “me” referring to a person who is infected with “eventual unification” disease, who is incompetent and who acts against the public will.
The new generation of the DPP uses the word “us” to refer to Taiwan as a nation, demonstrating a recognition of it, as well as our link to this land. It hopes to unite Taiwan and establish a democratic nation based on fair competition.
With one party embodying a return to dictatorship and one representing the advancement of democracy, the KMT and DPP are as different as chalk and cheese.
James Wang is a commentator based in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS