With the presidential primaries over, the battle between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is about to begin. As Ma cannot travel to the US, he is planning to hold a video conference with a think tank in Washington to address issues that concern the US, such as US beef. He is hoping to garner some positive press before the presidential election in January, such as visa exemption for Republic of China citizens or a new arms deal, to divert attention away from the many opinion polls showing Tsai in the lead.
Tsai’s nomination has been followed by rumors that, “following precedent,” she would visit Washington in her capacity as the DPP’s presidential candidate.
Taiwan-US relations are slowly beginning to have an effect on the presidential election campaign. However, rather than rushing to play the US card, the two sides would do better to offer thoughtful analysis of the recent personnel changes in US President Barack Obama’s administration.
Obama has also begun campaigning for re-election next year and in the past two months he has been reshuffling his national security and Asia-Pacific team. Over the next two years, these changes will have an impact on US global strategy and foreign policy.
These changes include nominating CIA Director Leon Panetta to succeed US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who has announced plans to retire this year and had in January visited Beijing to repair US-China military ties. US Army General David Petraeus, commander of US forces in Afghanistan and a man whom Obama trusts, will take over the CIA. Panetta is a Democrat stalwart who served as White House chief of staff under former US president Bill Clinton. Coupled with his experience as CIA director, he will be able to bring stability to Obama’s foreign policy if the latter wins a second term. Osama bin Laden’s death added another to Panetta’s list of foreign policy achievements.
Petraeus carries a lot of prestige in the US military and when General Stanley McChrystal, then-commander of US forces in Afghanistan, early last year criticized Obama’s US troop pullout policy as inappropriate, saying it would have a negative impact on the president’s standing as supreme commander of the US forces, Obama asked Petraeus to take over to calm down the military.
There have also been changes to officials in charge of Asia-Pacific affairs, which affect Taiwan and cross-strait relations. US Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg, said to be part of the pro-China faction, and the US National Security Council’s senior director of Asian affairs Jeffrey Bader have both resigned. Last year, forces in the US Department of State, led by US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, led to a tougher approach to China policy. US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian Affairs Kurt Campbell is thought to have influenced Clinton’s statements on several visits to Asia, and in the future, the department is likely to direct the Obama administration’s China policy.
Thomas Donilon, who was appointed national security adviser last year, is an expert on Korean affairs and he has on several occasions used Beijing to apply pressure on North Korean leader Kim Jong-il. Daniel Russel, a Japan expert, will replace Bader.
While these nominations still have to be approved by US Congress, these changes have several implications.
First, they are meant to strengthen the US’ ability to respond to sudden regional crises (eg, North Korea), its pullout from Afghanistan and its policy of engaging and counterbalancing China. Second, they reflect Washington’s increased focus on strengthening relations with its Asia-Pacific allies — Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Singapore and India. And third, as the US presidential election approaches, the Obama administration is not likely to want to appear too weak in US-China relations.
Although there will not be any changes in US policy on Taiwan, these new appointments will be monitoring the political situation in Taiwan and cross-strait developments once Taiwan’s presidential election campaign begins in earnest. Ma must pay attention to changes in US strategy to maintain the balance in Asia. As for Tsai, she may be able to turn her US visit into news for domestic consumption, but Obama’s new Asia-Pacific team is sure to pressure her on her cross-strait policy to make sure that there will not be any major changes if the DPP returns to power. These are the things Ma and Tsai should focus on.
Liu Shih-chung is a senior research fellow at Taiwan Brain Trust.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS