With the presidential primaries over, the battle between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is about to begin. As Ma cannot travel to the US, he is planning to hold a video conference with a think tank in Washington to address issues that concern the US, such as US beef. He is hoping to garner some positive press before the presidential election in January, such as visa exemption for Republic of China citizens or a new arms deal, to divert attention away from the many opinion polls showing Tsai in the lead.
Tsai’s nomination has been followed by rumors that, “following precedent,” she would visit Washington in her capacity as the DPP’s presidential candidate.
Taiwan-US relations are slowly beginning to have an effect on the presidential election campaign. However, rather than rushing to play the US card, the two sides would do better to offer thoughtful analysis of the recent personnel changes in US President Barack Obama’s administration.
Obama has also begun campaigning for re-election next year and in the past two months he has been reshuffling his national security and Asia-Pacific team. Over the next two years, these changes will have an impact on US global strategy and foreign policy.
These changes include nominating CIA Director Leon Panetta to succeed US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who has announced plans to retire this year and had in January visited Beijing to repair US-China military ties. US Army General David Petraeus, commander of US forces in Afghanistan and a man whom Obama trusts, will take over the CIA. Panetta is a Democrat stalwart who served as White House chief of staff under former US president Bill Clinton. Coupled with his experience as CIA director, he will be able to bring stability to Obama’s foreign policy if the latter wins a second term. Osama bin Laden’s death added another to Panetta’s list of foreign policy achievements.
Petraeus carries a lot of prestige in the US military and when General Stanley McChrystal, then-commander of US forces in Afghanistan, early last year criticized Obama’s US troop pullout policy as inappropriate, saying it would have a negative impact on the president’s standing as supreme commander of the US forces, Obama asked Petraeus to take over to calm down the military.
There have also been changes to officials in charge of Asia-Pacific affairs, which affect Taiwan and cross-strait relations. US Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg, said to be part of the pro-China faction, and the US National Security Council’s senior director of Asian affairs Jeffrey Bader have both resigned. Last year, forces in the US Department of State, led by US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, led to a tougher approach to China policy. US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian Affairs Kurt Campbell is thought to have influenced Clinton’s statements on several visits to Asia, and in the future, the department is likely to direct the Obama administration’s China policy.
Thomas Donilon, who was appointed national security adviser last year, is an expert on Korean affairs and he has on several occasions used Beijing to apply pressure on North Korean leader Kim Jong-il. Daniel Russel, a Japan expert, will replace Bader.
While these nominations still have to be approved by US Congress, these changes have several implications.
First, they are meant to strengthen the US’ ability to respond to sudden regional crises (eg, North Korea), its pullout from Afghanistan and its policy of engaging and counterbalancing China. Second, they reflect Washington’s increased focus on strengthening relations with its Asia-Pacific allies — Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Singapore and India. And third, as the US presidential election approaches, the Obama administration is not likely to want to appear too weak in US-China relations.
Although there will not be any changes in US policy on Taiwan, these new appointments will be monitoring the political situation in Taiwan and cross-strait developments once Taiwan’s presidential election campaign begins in earnest. Ma must pay attention to changes in US strategy to maintain the balance in Asia. As for Tsai, she may be able to turn her US visit into news for domestic consumption, but Obama’s new Asia-Pacific team is sure to pressure her on her cross-strait policy to make sure that there will not be any major changes if the DPP returns to power. These are the things Ma and Tsai should focus on.
Liu Shih-chung is a senior research fellow at Taiwan Brain Trust.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS