What happens when comic book meets ideology? Answer: An absurd distortion of history. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government has exemplified that in the most blatant way with its recent publication of a comic book history of the Republic of China’s (ROC) military.
The Ministry of National Defense on Tuesday launched the comic book, titled Eternal Glory, and meant to illustrate the grandeur of the ROC military’s might and perseverance as part of the KMT government’s celebration of the ROC’s centennial. The comic, however, dexterously managed to totally omit any mention of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Even though Lee and Chen’s years of governance combined takes up one-fifth of the ROC’s 100-year history, the ministry said its 280-page comic book did not have enough room to include every president. And yet, with the limited number of pages as claimed by the ministry, it somehow brilliantly managed to mention President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is merely in the third year of his presidency.
To be fair, the ministry deserves some kudos for wanting to connect with young people by coming up with the idea of a comic book to introduce the military’s gore and glory to the nation’s youngsters.
However, as it looks unlikely that the ministry would publish a sequel to Eternal Glory called The Missing 20 Years, elaborating on the history of the nation’s military under Lee’s and Chen’s presidencies, it is absolutely despicable that the ministry used taxpayers’ money for a publication that presents a distorted version of history. The distorting of historic facts in the comic book could also be seen as a violation of the principle of administrative neutrality.
Indeed, how convincing does the ministry expect the comic book to be if it depicts the evolution of the ROC’s military without a mention of Chen’s governance, under whose eight-year presidency the task of nationalizing the military was accomplished, a move that mirrored the nation’s democratization?
The level of destruction and damage caused by the massive earthquake on Sept. 21, 1999, resulted in far more devastation than the flood brought by Typhoon Morakot in August 2009, and Lee’s role as the president at the time of the 921 Earthquake disaster, during which he issued an executive order to activate an emergency decree, is without doubt more worthy of mention than the relatively small role played by Ma during the Morakot flooding.
The advanced weaponry the nation acquired under Lee’s and Chen’s presidencies is worth at least a mention, but this appeared to be lost in the ministry’s depiction of the nation’s military history.
So much for the ministry’s statement at the press conference on Tuesday held to launch the comic book that “staying true to history” was the approach it took when creating the comic.
This brings to mind how the KMT, when in opposition during Chen’s presidency, used to accuse the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of ruling the country by ideology, describing the administration’s work promoting Taiwanese consciousness as “de-Sinicization” (去中國化).
The KMT government appears to have taken “rule by ideology” to another level by unashamedly editing out historic facts from the comic book in line with partisan bias.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS