While Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential hopeful Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently revealed her vision of a nuclear-free Taiwan, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) seems to be reneging on his promise of establishing an all-volunteer military to replace conscription. Although these two issues might seem unrelated, they reveal the lack of a sense of responsibility in politicians.
Former Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲), once said that politicians are not necessarily bound to honor promises made during election campaigns. Whether this is correct depends on one’s interpretation of Lee’s statement. It is one thing to feel it means that politicians may break their promises if, after taking office, they are unable to fulfill their pledges despite their best efforts to do so.
However, one cannot agree with Lee’s statement if it is interpreted to mean that politicians have no moral obligation to honor a promise. An assurance made during an election campaign is a contract between a politician and the electorate. An individual gives their sacred vote to a politician because of specific promises and has no recourse if that politician later reneges. The only avenue open to them is to not vote for that politician again.
It is only right to exercise a degree of understanding should a politician be relatively new to politics or if some major catastrophe occurs during their term in office. In such cases, one should be forgiving. However, such latitude should not apply to a politician who has held major positions in central government, who has access to considerable political resources and who acts on their own volition, with no external pressure.
Both Tsai and Ma belong to the latter group.
Even former Atomic Energy Council chairman Ouyang Min-shen (歐陽敏盛), who is in the pan-green camp, questioned Tsai’s non-nuclear stance, saying that a completely non-nuclear Taiwan by 2025 was unworkable, unless we manage to replace it with green energy. Even if Tsai is elected president next year, there is nothing to say that her successor would continue her policies after 2020.
Surely Tsai has not forgotten what she learned during her time in senior positions in central government. How could she not be aware of the realities of Taiwan’s dependence on nuclear power? Did she really only become aware of the danger presented by Taiwan’s nuclear plants after the March 11 Japanese earthquake? If this is an indication of how she is going to perform if she ever makes it into office, one shouldn’t hold out too much hope.
Ma must have known the reality of the situation when he included establishing an all-volunteer military as one of his campaign promises. Now that he is in office, the Ministry of National Defense has announced on several occasions that conscription is to be scrapped on schedule.
Now we hear that because of financial constraints an all-volunteer system is unlikely and that the government has also considered other financing options that will benefit private business groups and not the general public.
Politicians are always big on ideas, if not concrete plans, continually failing to translate words into actions. They make promises, only to later dismiss public concern with various excuses. Both Tsai and Ma have proved to be more astute at academics than governance: That much we can see from the campaign promises they have made.
In the up and coming legislative and presidential elections, the electorate needs to think carefully about whose promises are actually feasible.
Ball Chang is an assistant professor at the Chihlee Institute of Technology’s Department of Applied English.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The Taipei District Court on Nov. 1 agreed to extend the detention of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for his suspected involvement in corruption involving a real-estate project during his time as Taipei mayor. Different voices are beginning to emerge from within the TPP about how to respond to their extended leaderless situation. Following a string of scandals coming to light since early August, including the TPP’s misreporting of election campaign finances and Ko’s alleged corruption related to the Core Pacific City redevelopment project, Ko on Aug. 29 announced he would take a three-month leave of absence from