If the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) wishes to win the presidential election next year, it should nominate former premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) for president.
First, Su is the DPP’s most outstandingly successful electoral politician. In 1989, he won the county commissionership in Pingtung County and was twice elected as Taipei County commissioner, in 1997 and 2001. Su was also elected twice as a provincial assemblyman and in 1995 as a legislator.
Even in his failed campaign for Taipei City mayor last year, Su obtained the second highest percentage of the vote ever obtained by a DPP candidate in Taiwan’s capital, where the DPP has never won an absolute majority of the votes.
PROVEN ADMINISTRATOR
Second, Su is a proven administrator. His re-election in 2001 as Taipei County commissioner demonstrated that the voters in Taiwan’s most populous and most complex local administrative unit approved of his administrative and political skills. Taiwanese as well as foreign observers of Taiwan’s government agree that he was undoubtedly the most successful of the five premiers under former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Thus, Su has by far the most successful administrative experience in large-scale governmental organizations, where most observers comment favorably about the excellence of his leadership and skill.
Third, as many as one-fifth to one-fourth of Taiwan’s voters are swing voters. This means that a very large proportion of the electorate choose their candidate on the basis of the candidate him/herself and the candidate’s platform, rather than their party.
This is one reason the DPP, which won over 50 percent of the presidential vote in 2004, slumped to less than 42 percent in 2008.
Many people who had voted twice for Chen voted for Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in 2008. And, they said, if Ma did not do a good job, they would vote DPP in the next election.
WIDE SUPPORT
Both public and private polls show that Su is both the strongest challenger to Ma and the one DPP candidate who can definitely defeat Ma. This is because Su appeals to swing voters. To win the presidency, a candidate in Taiwan must win the support of swing voters. Without this essential part of the electorate, a candidate will lose.
Fourth, Su appeals across both gender and generation lines. He has support among men and women as well as among young and old.
He also has support across all educational backgrounds and in all geographic areas of Taiwan.
His interest in and promotion of a wide variety of Taiwanese popular music, for example, has won strong support among the young.
KNOWLEDGEABLE
Fifth, Su has demonstrated a clear perception of problems as well as strategic analytical abilities in dealing with domestic politics and foreign relations. He is extraordinarily knowledgeable in international affairs. I know that several foreign correspondents, in addition to this writer, have been very impressed after extended interviews.
Su came into politics as a lawyer for the defendants in the Kaohsiung Incident trial of 1980. In 1986, he became a co-founder of the DPP and since then has made many contributions to both Taiwan and the DPP.
If the DPP wishes to win next year’s presidential election, it should nominate Su Tseng-chang.
Bruce Jacobs is a professor of Asian languages and studies and director of the Taiwan Research Unit at Monash University in Australia.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS