The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) states that the right to life is the most basic of human rights. However, in its decision to reject a request for constitutional interpretation on May 28 last year, the Council of Grand Justices said that following the spirit of Article 6, Paragraph 2 of the covenant, there is currently nothing to prevent the death penalty from being carried out in any country where it remains legal in cases of major crimes, providing the laws in effect at the time the crime was committed do not conflict with ICCPR regulations or the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Based on Paragraph 4 of the same article, the question of whether those who have received the death penalty have the right to ask for a pardon or a reduction in sentence as laid out in the Amnesty Act (赦免法) depends on how the legislature implements Article 8 of the Act to Implement the ICCPR and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (公民與政治權利國際公約及經濟社會文化權利國際公約施行法).
Under the current legal system, anyone in Taiwan who receives the death sentence and meets the conditions detailed in the Amnesty Act automatically has the right to request a general amnesty, a pardon or a sentence reduction.
Taiwan’s current implementation of the death penalty is not a violation of the regulations of the aforementioned covenants, nor is it just ink on paper, nor are such actions “against international human rights norms.”
The abolition of the death penalty hinges on the development of social ideas about the rule of law and a supporting consensus in wider society.
As many as 70 to 80 percent of Taiwanese currently oppose the abolition of capital punishment. The Ministry of Justice is therefore relying on legal amendments and other methods to gradually decrease the use of the death penalty and increase public support for the long-term goal of abolition.
However, “reducing the use of the death penalty” refers to both the decreased use of capital punishment in the legal system and being more careful when such sentences are passed.
This does not mean that death sentences confirmed in all three court instances will not be carried out in accordance with the law.
There is no conflict between President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) declaration that the use of the death penalty will decrease and the ministry carrying out death sentences, nor is this in any way contradictory or hypocritical.
The cases of the five death row inmates recently executed in accordance with the law had all been subject to careful and detailed investigation. They were provided with a forceful defense by their lawyers and the death penalty was only carried out after their cases were heard and reviewed in three instances.
Two of the men, Chung Teh-shu (鍾德樹) and Kuan Chung-yen (管鐘演), had their cases remanded by the court six times, and while on death row all five asked for retrials and extraordinary appeals on several occasions.
When all the appeals in a death sentence have been exhausted, the ministry appoints dedicated personnel to carefully examine all information in the case based on the aforementioned points, to ensure the prisoner’s right to appeal is protected. This is very different from what happened to Chiang Kuo-ching (江國慶), who was wrongfully executed in 1997. I really do not see how people are now connecting the two cases and saying more and more people are likely to be wrongfully put to death.
Wu Chen-huan is Deputy Minister of Justice.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
The Constitutional Court on Wednesday last week held a preparatory hearing for an injunction request to halt the enforcement of controversial new amendments to government oversight laws. Constitutional Court oral arguments are scheduled for Aug. 6 on the constitutionality of amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and the Criminal Code, which were passed on May 28 by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers. The amendments were signed into law on June 24 and promulgated on June 26. However, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislative caucus, the Executive Yuan, President William Lai (賴清德) and the Control