The determinatioN of the EU to strengthen its cooperation with Taiwan has never been as perceptible as these recent years. Indeed, aside from the fact that 18 EU member states have representative offices in Taipei despite the absence of diplomatic ties, the EU established a European Economic and Trade Office in Taipei in 2003 and an EU Center in 2009. Last month, the EU also included Taiwan on its Schengen visa-free list, a move considered by Taiwanese authorities as a “vote of confidence” from the union.
This confidence has also been expressed by the European Commission in the research area through its call for a larger participation of Taiwan in its 7th Framework Program for Research (FP7), regarded as the EU’s main instrument for funding research with a budget of more than 50 billion euros (US$67.8 billion) covering a period from 2007 to 2013.
To strengthen Taiwan’s involvement in the FP7, the European Commission and the National Science Council launched a Taiwan-National Contact Point (NCP) in September 2008 and a network of eight thematic NCPs — health, food and biotechnology, information and communication technologies (ICT), nanotechnology, energy, environment, humanities and security — last month to promote the FP7 locally and facilitate the participation of Taiwanese researchers in the international consortium built to respond to the EU research projects’ call.
Last year, Taiwan participated in 17 FP7 projects, notably in ICT, environment and health. In health, Taiwan was involved in projects on pandemic influenza, hospital safety and neglected virus. Besides the daily devotion of the Taiwanese NCPs and the fact that they are still in a learning process, there is more room for Taiwan’s participation considering the quality of its research. In comparison, South Korea has joined 32 FP7 projects and Japan 38, not to mention China’s involvement in 160 FP7 projects.
Expanding Taiwanese participation in EU projects also depends on Taiwanese researchers’ motivation to join the international consortium created to respond to FP7 calls for research proposals. In health research, for example, the incentives to join EU projects are manifest.
First, the EU offers a unique opportunity to join large-scale multilateral research partnership with all the benefits that consequent budget have in terms of health research capacities and that different research cultures bring in terms of innovation.
Second, while most Taiwanese health researchers look to the US or Japan for external funding, working with European researchers represents a “niche” for the most audacious of the young researchers and a crucial extension of the research network for the most experienced scientists. Besides, diversifying their financial resources is a guarantee of sustainability and quality.
Finally, Taiwanese and Europeans scientists share numerous health research interests, which make partnership between them indispensable to improve global health.
All these reasons are also valid for other areas covered by the FP7. Taiwanese researchers are considered valuable partners by European scientists and the EU is very supportive of their involvement in FP7 projects. Taiwanese scientists shouldn’t miss this opportunity because — to paraphrase well-known German writer, J.W Goethe — great researchers are “the ones who seize the moment.”
Vincent Rollet is the European affairs adviser, Yang Pan-chyr is principal investigator and Peter Chang, co-principal investigator for Taiwan EU Framework Program for Research, Health National Contact Point.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS