President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has once again demonstrated his preference for style over substance with the launch of his own Facebook page yesterday.
There’s not much on the site yet, just two videos, some personal information like his birth date, the address of the Presidential Office Building, a brief biography and a short statement about how he hopes to use the site to share views with the public. Oh, and he listed jogging and swimming under “interests.” These details are hardly earth-shattering or informative, yet by yesterday afternoon, 62,551 netizens had clicked on the “like” button on Ma’s page.
Presidential Office spokesman Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) said on Thursday it was natural that in such a wired society as Taiwan the government would use the Internet for heart-to-heart talks with the public.
The good news is that now Ma is on Facebook, he can join the millions of his countrymen and countrywomen (on both sides of the Taiwan Strait) who play Happy Farm. The game, in which players grow crops, trade and sell their produce or just steal it from others, could provide him with useful skills for cross-strait negotiations — or it might have, if he had started playing it before the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement was signed, a pact that basically gave away the farm as far as many Taiwanese are concerned.
However, spoilsport Lo was also at pains to reassure the public that Ma would not spend too much time on his new Facebook account, noting that his boss was good at time management and would only be posting messages occasionally.
Well, so much for the idea of Ma keeping in touch with public opinion and sharing views.
One can only hope that Ma does a better job communicating via his Facebook page than he has done with his much-touted online video addresses (Weekly Journal on Governing the Country) on Saturdays, which if memory serves was also meant to be a platform for two-way communication with netizens. The idea was for Ma to comment on events occurring each week, a plan that spectacularly backfired on him in July 2009 when a far more technically savvy netizen than the average Presidential Office staffer realized that Ma had recorded at least three weeks worth of speeches.
Ma has frequently shown himself impervious to outside advice and that would appear to be the case here, for just a few weeks ago one of his presidential advisers said successful people don’t spend too much time on Facebook. Lee Chia-tung (李家同) also said people should spend more time learning about things and engaging in more meaningful activities.
Of course the real reason Ma has launched a Facebook page has little to do with exchanging views and much to do with next year’s presidential election. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) appears to be of the belief that young voters are more inclined to favor the Democratic Progressive Party and so it is trying to develop a hipper image to make up for the lack of substantial and effective policies on issues of concern to young people.
Issues such as the lack of jobs for graduates and vocational school leavers — as well as many middle-aged workers — declining pay scales, grossly inflated housing prices, profligate government spending on fireworks and anniversary events to the detriment of social programs and a government that appears unwilling to defend the nation it is supposed to represent, all of these and so much more cannot be tackled with a few words on Facebook.
Ma has yet to live up to the campaign promises he made ahead of the 2008 election. He and his administration should make more of an effort to make those come true before they focus on next year’s polls. Then he might really have something to brag about on Facebook.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS