Former top envoy to the US Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) on Sunday criticized the government, saying it ignores and suppresses dissenting opinions in its exchanges with China. Wu said the result was further division, and that domestic reconciliation is more important than cross-strait reconciliation.
While Wu hit the nail on the head, he could have gone one step further: To President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), reconciliation within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is more important than domestic reconciliation.
During Ma’s almost three years in power, relations between the government and the opposition have been tense. Apart from one televised debate between Ma and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), there has been no dialogue between the two party leaders, and the government and the opposition parties don’t communicate, making it difficult to build any kind of consensus. Given the close official and unofficial relations between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), it’s no surprise that it has been said that the KMT is closer to Beiping — an old name for Beijing — than to Beiping East Road in Taipei, the location of the DPP’s party headquarters.
However, Ma’s relations with local governments are even more worrying than the relationship between the government and the opposition. In the five special municipality elections, the KMT basically abandoned the south, and in central Taiwan, Greater Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) only barely won against the DPP’s Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全), even though Su was parachuted in for the election.
Ma is neglecting local governments and clearly dislikes local factions. This alienates him from local leaders, making it difficult to consolidate voter support. Without his best campaign worker in 2008, then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), Ma is facing an uphill battle in next year’s presidential election. The clearest indicator of his poor local connections is his relationship with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
Wang’s political background differs from Ma’s. Having been elected to the legislature in 1975, Wang is now the most senior legislator in Taiwan. As legislative speaker from 1999 and following the changes in government, he has gained the respect of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), Chen and KMT as well as DPP lawmakers. He also has many contacts with local politicians. Wang is very important to the KMT, but after the battle between him and Ma for the KMT chairmanship in 2005 turned ugly, the relationship between the two has been tense.
As Wang and his deputy Tseng Yung-chuan (曾永權) are facing rules restricting KMT members to two nominations as legislator at large, the question is whether they will run for a constituency seat. This is a key test of Ma and Wang’s relationship and political skills. Ma can handle the issue in one of three ways. He could continue to ignore Wang and let him run for a legislative seat. That would probably mean that Wang would not campaign for Ma’s re--election, and he could even become an obstacle to it. Second, Ma could change the rules, giving the speaker and the vice speaker the right to continue to serve as legislators at large. Wang might then make a small effort to promote Ma’s re-election. Finally, Ma could make Wang his vice presidential candidate to consolidate voter support in the south and ensure Wang’s all-out support to help Ma get re-elected.
With the five special municipality elections over, KMT Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) has decided to hand his post over to Presidential Office Secretary-General Liao Liou-yi (廖了以), who is well connected to the local factions and excels at interpersonal relations. How to resolve the problems between Ma and Wang and improve the political climate is something that will weigh on the minds of Liao, Ma and Wang over the Lunar New Year holidays.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS