Out of place criticism
Reading Callum McGovern’s letters (Letters, Jan. 9 and Jan. 21, page 8), I wonder if he was living in or talking about the same country I am living in.
Generalizing one’s own experience is always a dangerous thing. I have been in Taiwan on and off since 1983 and have lived here for the past 15 years. Not once have I experienced racism. My wife is Indonesian and does not speak Chinese or Taiwanese. She loves it here and says people here are very friendly, kind and helpful. We live in Kaohsiung, where the “light-skinned mainland Chinese” are in short supply, which might be part of the explanation. While we are stigmatizing and throwing prejudices around, he talks of politicians, but when were they ever human?
I have known several foreign workers here in Taiwan. None has any problem with the Taiwanese in general. The harshest, and in that respect the most racist, treatment they ever got was always from their employers.
Have you seen how workers, even Taiwanese ones, are treated at small companies or even multinationals such as McDonalds. That is not racism; it is exploitation pure and simple.
Having lived and worked on three continents, I settled in Taiwan because of its people. People here are kind, open-minded, always ready to help. As to their English ability, the first time I came here, 1983, I did not speak a single word of Chinese and to my surprise, wherever I went I found people that spoke English.
When was it ever the case that one could get by with English in Germany or France? Try to find someone that speaks English in any other place other than a major tourist stop. It’s impossible. Nine years ago I landed at Nurenberg Airport, an international terminal in Germany. Not a single person I spoke to there spoke English.
I have to disappoint McGovern when he states that English is the most widely spoken language on earth. Wrong! Chinese is. Check your facts. Only about 1 billion people speak English. Only 300 million are native speakers and their numbers are declining. Add Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau and Singapore to all the Mandarin speakers in China and we easily get 1.33 billion people that speak Chinese as their native tongue.
GEERT ANTHONIS
Kaohsiung
In response to McGovern’s letters, I will cede that as in any society, there is indeed racism in Taiwan, but according to my experience it is relatively rare. Concluding the opposite after seeing Taiwanese staff writing waiguoren on your receipt for identification seems overly dramatic.
McGovern was apparently spat on, but never in my life did I get even close to this miserable treatment in Taiwan. Generally speaking, I am more embarrassed by the (positive) special treatment people give me.
In most cases, racism in Taiwan concerns “darker” Asians and blacks. I remember a ridiculous advertisement four years ago asking explicitly for a Caucasian English language teacher. McGovern’s claim that looking at the lawmakers’ ethnic background proves his point is also unfair. The Netherlands and the UK are often cited as some of the most liberal countries on earth, yet very few ethnic minorities have climbed up the social ladder far enough to get top positions in domestic politics there.
I would like to add that Taiwanese, South Koreans and Japanese are not just being forced to learn English, but display a genuine curiosity toward the Western world.
J.C. BRON
Luodong, Yilan County
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS