Out of place criticism
Reading Callum McGovern’s letters (Letters, Jan. 9 and Jan. 21, page 8), I wonder if he was living in or talking about the same country I am living in.
Generalizing one’s own experience is always a dangerous thing. I have been in Taiwan on and off since 1983 and have lived here for the past 15 years. Not once have I experienced racism. My wife is Indonesian and does not speak Chinese or Taiwanese. She loves it here and says people here are very friendly, kind and helpful. We live in Kaohsiung, where the “light-skinned mainland Chinese” are in short supply, which might be part of the explanation. While we are stigmatizing and throwing prejudices around, he talks of politicians, but when were they ever human?
I have known several foreign workers here in Taiwan. None has any problem with the Taiwanese in general. The harshest, and in that respect the most racist, treatment they ever got was always from their employers.
Have you seen how workers, even Taiwanese ones, are treated at small companies or even multinationals such as McDonalds. That is not racism; it is exploitation pure and simple.
Having lived and worked on three continents, I settled in Taiwan because of its people. People here are kind, open-minded, always ready to help. As to their English ability, the first time I came here, 1983, I did not speak a single word of Chinese and to my surprise, wherever I went I found people that spoke English.
When was it ever the case that one could get by with English in Germany or France? Try to find someone that speaks English in any other place other than a major tourist stop. It’s impossible. Nine years ago I landed at Nurenberg Airport, an international terminal in Germany. Not a single person I spoke to there spoke English.
I have to disappoint McGovern when he states that English is the most widely spoken language on earth. Wrong! Chinese is. Check your facts. Only about 1 billion people speak English. Only 300 million are native speakers and their numbers are declining. Add Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau and Singapore to all the Mandarin speakers in China and we easily get 1.33 billion people that speak Chinese as their native tongue.
GEERT ANTHONIS
Kaohsiung
In response to McGovern’s letters, I will cede that as in any society, there is indeed racism in Taiwan, but according to my experience it is relatively rare. Concluding the opposite after seeing Taiwanese staff writing waiguoren on your receipt for identification seems overly dramatic.
McGovern was apparently spat on, but never in my life did I get even close to this miserable treatment in Taiwan. Generally speaking, I am more embarrassed by the (positive) special treatment people give me.
In most cases, racism in Taiwan concerns “darker” Asians and blacks. I remember a ridiculous advertisement four years ago asking explicitly for a Caucasian English language teacher. McGovern’s claim that looking at the lawmakers’ ethnic background proves his point is also unfair. The Netherlands and the UK are often cited as some of the most liberal countries on earth, yet very few ethnic minorities have climbed up the social ladder far enough to get top positions in domestic politics there.
I would like to add that Taiwanese, South Koreans and Japanese are not just being forced to learn English, but display a genuine curiosity toward the Western world.
J.C. BRON
Luodong, Yilan County
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS