ECFA is carcinogenic
The government recently approved 207 applications (including 192 applications pertaining to industrial products and 15 applications pertaining to agricultural products) for Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) production site certificates. The industrial products are predominantly petrochemicals, followed by machining and textiles. According to the ECFA, China will allow the import of 557 Taiwanese items, in which petrochemicals are the major items. This means Taiwan will export mainly petrochemical products to China.
The national cancer map for 2008 shows that after the sixth naphtha cracker started operation in 2001, Yunlin County and adjacent Chiayi County have cancer death rates that are 1.23 to 1.53 times higher than the national average (“Say no to proposed Kuokuang project,” Dec. 22, 2010, page 8). The incidence of cardiovascular disease and strokes also clearly increased and carcinogens emitted by the petrochemical industry were found in urine samples of residents near the naphtha cracker.
The proposed Kuokuang petrochemical complex involves building the nation’s eighth naphtha cracker in Changhua County’s Dacheng Township (大城). Unless the proposed project is canceled, residents of Changhua will suffer the same fate as their counterparts in Yunlin and Chiayi.
In addition, ecology in the wetland and flora and fauna in the vicinity will be damaged.
Taiwan should not export petrochemicals to China at the cost of the health and lives of Taiwanese. It is ironic for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to order national security-level steps to increase the nation’s birthrate and, at the same time, to promote the construction of the Kuokuang complex that will emit carcinogens to kill Taiwanese. Apparently, the Kuokuang project is to meet Chinese market demand.
Is the ECFA a tool for prosperity in China and death in Taiwan?
Scaling down the project by one-third is not a solution. Complete cancellation is the only solution.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Playing the blame game
The shooting on Sunday of US Representative Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona was an appalling crime. Yet the insinuation in your front-page piece on Monday that this is somehow Sarah Palin’s fault or the fault of the Tea Party movement is absurd; such a claim is little different from the claim that violence on TV causes violence in real life (“US lawmaker shot in the head, in critical condition,” Jan. 10, page 1).
Yet although it may be absurd, the purpose of slipping it into the subhead and elsewhere in the report is transparently manipulative: To discredit generally conservative or libertarian criticism of big government by tenuous association with the appalling actions of an apparent lunatic.
Yet any honest observer of the numerous demonstrations and events held by the Tea Party movement throughout the last year must admit that US conservatives — even the hardcore constitutionalists — are simply not lunatics calling for the summary execution of politicians. To say such a thing is dishonest; to insinuate it is both devious and dishonest.
MICHAEL FAGAN.
Tainan
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS