Saying no to bullying
The issue of school bullying has recently attracted a great deal of media attention and been the subject of a seemingly endless number of debates, the consensus being that the situation has grown worse. Not only students, but also teachers can suffer from bullying (“Getting to the root of school bullying,” Dec. 31, page 8). For this reason, the Executive Yuan has established an inter-ministerial platform to address student discipline problems. It is imperative that active measures be taken to nip this in the bud now. How to curb bullying should be everyone’s business.
As to causes, we should understand that there is no one reason that young students misbehave. The main cause is that morality and ethics are largely ignored by an education system that is entirely examination-oriented.
According to news reports, about 10 percent of students have suffered from bullying and about 30 percent choose to ignore it.
As a society this is an issue we must approach with a great deal of care. There are so many students with different personalities and family backgrounds. School teachers perhaps understand them best, whereas school principals and heads of student affairs are likely to only recognize the outstanding and the most mischievous. If a student creates problems, all they can do is ask the homeroom teacher for advice. As such, the relationship between the homeroom teacher and students is very close and can affect the attitude of the whole class. Homeroom teachers have a direct impact on students.
Schools are a place where teachers, students and parents interact, but many parents have convinced themselves that it is the schools that are to blame for children’s behavior. This ignores the fact that students with problems at home are more likely to become troublemakers at school. Given this relationship, homeroom teachers should play the role of communicator between the school, students and parents.
Increasingly easy access to all kinds of information can make it difficult for students to distinguish between right and wrong, and this is one of the reasons behind a discernible change in student attitudes in recent years.
Clearly, bullying at school needs to be deterred, and where that fails, severely punished, For this reason, schools should perhaps teach law-related courses, to ensure students have a grasp of the rule of law and its implications. In the meantime, teenagers need to learn to take responsibility for their actions.
Furthermore, parents and teachers should work more closely together to ensure children are supervised at all times, so than any indication of bullying can be dealt with immediately. Parents must also take their share of the blame for the bullying that plagues our school system.
VICKY LIN
Yilan City
Lost in translation
I went to McDonald’s near Nanjing E Road MRT Station today and instead of being asked for my name when placing my order, the member of staff chose to write waiguo ren (foreigner, 外國人) on my receipt.
That individual then chose to cover the word with a ketchup sachet so other staff members would not notice.
I went back later in the day to complain about the incident, but no apology was offered and the manager of the restaurant seemed to find nothing wrong with what had happened.
Rather than get caught up in my own frustrations with racial discrimination in Taiwan, let’s explore the impact and consequences that this sort of behavior can have on a country as a whole.
Racism and prejudice are rife in Taiwan and many foreigners living here find themselves discriminated against on a daily basis, being walked past in lines, shouted at by passers-by, stared and glared at on the street and even spat at.
How does Taiwan as a nation expect to be accepted by the international community as a serious political and economic stakeholder if even politicians are allowed to express discriminatory views against foreigners without being challenged by the political opposition?
If Taiwan really wants to make progress it must seek to eradicate this social prejudice.
Taiwanese have what amounts to an obsession with visa-waiver programs and the desire to live/work/study abroad. With this in mind, perhaps people should examine how they expect to be treated abroad, and compare that to the treatment they give to foreigners in their homeland.
CALLUM MCGOVERN
Taipei City
Mixed messages
Recently, while visiting a Starbucks here in Taiwan, I noticed posters on the wall that proudly announced the company’s dedication to helping poor communities by buying coffee from poor farmers in those regions. Then my attention was drawn to all the needless garbage piled up — plastic cups, spoons, knives, forks, paper plates, wax paper, etc. I asked for my coffee in a mug, but the other 20 or so customers were using paper and plastic cups. If Starbucks is dedicated to helping poor regions of the world, doesn’t it realize that all the waste it produces is going to end up in the water, land and air as garbage in those areas? Time to clean up your act, Starbucks.
MICHAEL LESSER
Tainan City
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS