Amid all of the public “sympathy” for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on the night of Nov. 26 and during the elections the following day, it was easy to miss the major implications the shooting of Sean Lien (連勝文) had for Taiwan.
After the shooting death of Huang Yun-sheng (黃運聖) and the wounding of Lien, the KMT orchestrated a wonderful media blitz campaign which, although far from subtle to most knowledgeable observers, appears to have had a major effect on the election results.
Although the shooting may not have claimed the elections in Taipei, Sinbei and Taichung, it almost certainly widened the margins of victory that the KMT enjoyed.
It is quite obvious that the KMT gained from politicizing the tragic event (while simultaneously warning the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) not to make the tragedy a political issue). It is also disgraceful how certain groups in society tried to shame the DPP — for making the exact same appeal.
In my estimation, the media — as well as the DPP — both missed a key aspect of the shooting. Instead of spending so much time and effort mourning the loss of an individual and the injury to another, the DPP and the media should have taken some time to assess the threat posed to the real victim in this situation: the broader Taiwanese public.
True, this approach would have been hard for society to swallow.
Indeed, I’m sure stating the reality of the situation would have sounded insensitive, heartless, cruel and all those other adjectives that are used to make the truth sound evil.
It is difficult to describe society as a victim when a single individual is dead and his family mourns him. It is hard to call society a casualty when another individual is shot through the face and his father weeps bitterly for the entire world to see.
However, the reality of the situation is, before the election, at least to my knowledge, neither the DPP nor the media asked the really difficult questions that were on every interested, knowledgeable and concerned observer’s mind: just what in the hell are gang members and others with gang affiliation doing at a KMT political rally, and just what are KMT politicians doing having relations with gang members?
Some, of course, passed it off as a DPP political ploy from the beginning, comparing it to the “staged” political violence of March 19, 2004, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was shot.
By this line of reasoning, the DPP orchestrated the shooting to win political support and public sympathy for then-candidate Chen.
The ironic twist when comparing the two shootings is that last month’s incident involved the DPP “conspiring” to shoot a KMT candidate. The argument, then, loses all credibility as it makes the acts contradictory and at least one of them counterproductive.
It seems the DPP can be blamed for everything. The DPP injures its own and injures (and kills) others, all for its political amusement. The DPP destroyed Taiwan’s economy. The DPP upset China. And, contrary to all historical evidence, it is in fact the DPP that has the strongest ties to the Taiwanese (and, for that matter, Chinese) underworld.
This is all preposterous, but arguably the most preposterous of all is the claim by some KMT supporters that the DPP’s hands are the deepest of all in the underworld grime. It is of course possible that the shootings of both March 19, 2004, and Nov. 26, this year, were organized and carried out by the DPP and/or its supporters.
Just about anything is possible in politics, but the fact of the matter is that DPP involvement in either case is highly unlikely.
Indeed, the KMT itself is known worldwide as one of the most corrupt political parties ever to have existed. This doesn’t make the KMT itself or its individual members and supporters evil. But it does make the KMT quite frightening.
Cooperation between gangs and the KMT can be traced at least as far back as the period before the Shanghai White Terror in 1927, also known as the Great Purge, where Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and the KMT made use of underworld informants, terrorists and executioners, most of whom were members of the Green Gang, in an attempt to clear the metropolis of Communists.
These hooligans were then, after Shanghai was for all intents and purposes rid of leftists, turned on the business community to extract funds for state use.
Writing in this period, Herbert Owen Chapman states that “Wealthy Chinese would be arrested in their homes or mysteriously disappeared from the streets; and those who reappeared came back as poorer men, but could in no case be induced to ... inform on their oppressors,” even “Millionaires were arrested as ‘communists’!”
Chiang had become acquainted with the Green Gang criminal organization sometime between 1915 and 1923 while living in Shanghai.
In fact, the KMT and the Green Gang shared the profits of the drug trade after the establishment of the Opium Suppression Bureau.
Such cooperation certainly didn’t end with the suppression of the Communists in 1927. The KMT used the Green Gang to retain order in Shanghai throughout the “Nanking Decade.” What is more, the KMT depended to some extent on the Green Gang when the Japanese invaded Shanghai in 1937.
This of course does not necessarily implicate the KMT today, but the fact that the party has a long history of cooperation with gangs and still has strong ties to many of the largest triad groups in Taiwan today should make journalists, opposition politicians and society in general suspicious whenever the KMT invokes the “DPP and pro-DPP gangs dunnit” explanation. Indeed, it should make the KMT politically suspect in general.
Taiwan should mourn the loss of Huang. It should be saddened by the injuries sustained by Lien. It should be enraged at senseless gang-related violence, but it should also start asking the difficult, uncomfortable questions that need to be asked if Taiwan’s society is not itself to become a casualty.
Asking questions like “Just what exactly are people affiliated with gangs doing having relations with well-known KMT members and their families?” and “What are these KMT politicians and their family members with gang affiliation doing running for office?” is an excellent place to start.
However, these questions need to be asked soon. Otherwise, I’m afraid Taiwan’s society is already a casualty and Taiwan’s democracy is merely farce.
Nathan Novak studies China and the Asia-Pacific region with a particular focus on cross-strait relations at National Sun Yat-sen University.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
RSS