After coming under fire for not standing up for Taiwanese taekwondo athlete Yang Shu-chun (楊淑君) in the immediate aftermath of her controversial disqualification from the Asian Games last week, the government finally caught on two days later, holding a press conference on Friday pledging to seek justice for Yang.
However, despite the action undertaken by members of the public who, on their own initiative, gave Yang a hero’s welcome upon her arrival in Taipei on Monday, the government has done little to show that it is determined to follow through on its vow to defend Yang’s name and dignity.
After watching government inaction and listening to officials’ rhetoric, many wonder if President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is sincere in saying that it will seek justice, or if it is merely hoping that making promises is enough to quell public outrage.
The Ma government said it would offer reasonable compensation to Yang, with Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) adding that Yang would be treated as a gold medalist. It turns out, however, that Yang may not get the NT$3 million (US$98,000) cash award usually presented to gold medal winners, with Wu saying the Sports Affairs Council would have to convene a meeting to determine whether the money would be issued to Yang as a cash award or in the form of a fund for the purpose of training.
The Ma government called for a probe into Yang’s controversial disqualification. With an Asian Taekwondo Union (ATU) investigation still under way, why was the premier so quick and so certain when he defended ATU vice president Zhao Lei (趙磊) on Monday, saying that Zhao did not play a role in Yang’s disqualification?
The Ma government said it would stand behind Yang and fight for fair treatment. The ATU later apologized for posting an article on its Web site accusing Yang and the Taiwan team of cheating, but the apology was only made in a private meeting. If the Ma government is interested in clearing Yang’s name, it should demand that the ATU post the apology on its Web site to make it clear that Yang is not a cheater. In view of the rampant articles in the Chinese media branding Yang a cheater, shouldn’t the Ma government order the Government Information Office to issue a rebuttal or demand that Chinese media correct their libelous reports?
The Ma government said it would seek justice for Yang. Its plan to abandon filing the case with the Court of Arbitration for Sport and instead sue World Taekwondo Federation secretary-general Yang Jin-suk in Guangzhou, China, for slander and forgery perplexes many. Aside from the murky legal proceedings, one prominent question also rings in the minds of many: Can a local court in China restore justice to Yang as effectively as the Court of Arbitration for Sport could?
The unfair disqualification has sparked indignation among Taiwanese. However, it would be even more despicable if the Taiwanese athlete’s own government were to play a part in covering up the real culprit of the unfair ruling and fails to keep its pledge to stand up for its athletes’ rights.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS