Nothing could serve as a better example of wasted taxpayers’ money than a TV spot recently sponsored by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) to promote the dignity of the Republic of China’s (ROC) national flag, utilizing the tag line “Wherever the national flag is initially located, [it should] remain there.” Apparently the government has not heard of “leading by example.”
If the government had some foresight, and not only deep pockets, it could have avoided making itself a laughingstock by promoting the message to safeguard the national flag from the first day of its tenure, a gesture that comes as second nature for any governing power that takes its nation’s sovereignty seriously.
The TV commercial appears to have backfired. While it seeks to convey a positive image of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government for upholding the dignity of the ROC national flag, it has instead served to remind the public of how unreasonably it has treated people who wave national flags whenever Chinese delegations visit.
For example, recall how the government restricted the public from expressing their love for the ROC flag when Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited in November 2008. People waving the national flag were roughed up by police, who boorishly snatched the flags away. Some even had their flag poles snapped in half and their fingers broken.
Halfway through the MAC-sponsored TV commercial, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) face pops into view with a voice-over saying: “Of course the Republic of China is a sovereign country.”
While it may be the council intention to reinforce Ma’s image as a stern head of state asserting the ROC’s sovereignty, it instead reminds viewers that Ma, during his tenure as Taipei mayor in 2002, dissuaded sports fans from displaying ROC flags at the Asian women’s soccer championship.
If Ma doesn’t have the spine to address himself as the ROC president to Chen’s face, how convincing does the Ma government think the TV ad will be with the public?
According to MAC Minister Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛), the TV spot was inspired by an incident early last month in which officials from the Chinese Taipei University Sports Federation asked Kainan University students to take down their 1m high national flag at a game between the Taiwan University All-Stars and China’s Tianjin Polytechnic University.
While Lai’s remarks come as a slap in the face of Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who said at the time that the incident was the result of “some people deliberately provoking disputes by using the [ROC] flag,” they also led many to wonder why the MAC is trying to glorify the national flag at this time — just over a week before the Nov. 27 elections — even though it chose to ignore police officers’ offensive treatment of people flying the ROC flag in the past.
If the Ma government were sincere about upholding the dignity of the ROC national flag, it should keep running the TV spot during Chen’s visit to Taiwan next month. Better yet, when Chen visits Taiwan, his motorcade should be decorated with ROC flags and he should be given an ROC flag as a gift from the nation. Only then would the Taiwanese public be convinced that the Ma government is not just paying lip service with taxpayers’ money.
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS