Nothing could serve as a better example of wasted taxpayers’ money than a TV spot recently sponsored by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) to promote the dignity of the Republic of China’s (ROC) national flag, utilizing the tag line “Wherever the national flag is initially located, [it should] remain there.” Apparently the government has not heard of “leading by example.”
If the government had some foresight, and not only deep pockets, it could have avoided making itself a laughingstock by promoting the message to safeguard the national flag from the first day of its tenure, a gesture that comes as second nature for any governing power that takes its nation’s sovereignty seriously.
The TV commercial appears to have backfired. While it seeks to convey a positive image of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government for upholding the dignity of the ROC national flag, it has instead served to remind the public of how unreasonably it has treated people who wave national flags whenever Chinese delegations visit.
For example, recall how the government restricted the public from expressing their love for the ROC flag when Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited in November 2008. People waving the national flag were roughed up by police, who boorishly snatched the flags away. Some even had their flag poles snapped in half and their fingers broken.
Halfway through the MAC-sponsored TV commercial, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) face pops into view with a voice-over saying: “Of course the Republic of China is a sovereign country.”
While it may be the council intention to reinforce Ma’s image as a stern head of state asserting the ROC’s sovereignty, it instead reminds viewers that Ma, during his tenure as Taipei mayor in 2002, dissuaded sports fans from displaying ROC flags at the Asian women’s soccer championship.
If Ma doesn’t have the spine to address himself as the ROC president to Chen’s face, how convincing does the Ma government think the TV ad will be with the public?
According to MAC Minister Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛), the TV spot was inspired by an incident early last month in which officials from the Chinese Taipei University Sports Federation asked Kainan University students to take down their 1m high national flag at a game between the Taiwan University All-Stars and China’s Tianjin Polytechnic University.
While Lai’s remarks come as a slap in the face of Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who said at the time that the incident was the result of “some people deliberately provoking disputes by using the [ROC] flag,” they also led many to wonder why the MAC is trying to glorify the national flag at this time — just over a week before the Nov. 27 elections — even though it chose to ignore police officers’ offensive treatment of people flying the ROC flag in the past.
If the Ma government were sincere about upholding the dignity of the ROC national flag, it should keep running the TV spot during Chen’s visit to Taiwan next month. Better yet, when Chen visits Taiwan, his motorcade should be decorated with ROC flags and he should be given an ROC flag as a gift from the nation. Only then would the Taiwanese public be convinced that the Ma government is not just paying lip service with taxpayers’ money.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS