Nothing could serve as a better example of wasted taxpayers’ money than a TV spot recently sponsored by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) to promote the dignity of the Republic of China’s (ROC) national flag, utilizing the tag line “Wherever the national flag is initially located, [it should] remain there.” Apparently the government has not heard of “leading by example.”
If the government had some foresight, and not only deep pockets, it could have avoided making itself a laughingstock by promoting the message to safeguard the national flag from the first day of its tenure, a gesture that comes as second nature for any governing power that takes its nation’s sovereignty seriously.
The TV commercial appears to have backfired. While it seeks to convey a positive image of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government for upholding the dignity of the ROC national flag, it has instead served to remind the public of how unreasonably it has treated people who wave national flags whenever Chinese delegations visit.
For example, recall how the government restricted the public from expressing their love for the ROC flag when Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited in November 2008. People waving the national flag were roughed up by police, who boorishly snatched the flags away. Some even had their flag poles snapped in half and their fingers broken.
Halfway through the MAC-sponsored TV commercial, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) face pops into view with a voice-over saying: “Of course the Republic of China is a sovereign country.”
While it may be the council intention to reinforce Ma’s image as a stern head of state asserting the ROC’s sovereignty, it instead reminds viewers that Ma, during his tenure as Taipei mayor in 2002, dissuaded sports fans from displaying ROC flags at the Asian women’s soccer championship.
If Ma doesn’t have the spine to address himself as the ROC president to Chen’s face, how convincing does the Ma government think the TV ad will be with the public?
According to MAC Minister Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛), the TV spot was inspired by an incident early last month in which officials from the Chinese Taipei University Sports Federation asked Kainan University students to take down their 1m high national flag at a game between the Taiwan University All-Stars and China’s Tianjin Polytechnic University.
While Lai’s remarks come as a slap in the face of Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who said at the time that the incident was the result of “some people deliberately provoking disputes by using the [ROC] flag,” they also led many to wonder why the MAC is trying to glorify the national flag at this time — just over a week before the Nov. 27 elections — even though it chose to ignore police officers’ offensive treatment of people flying the ROC flag in the past.
If the Ma government were sincere about upholding the dignity of the ROC national flag, it should keep running the TV spot during Chen’s visit to Taiwan next month. Better yet, when Chen visits Taiwan, his motorcade should be decorated with ROC flags and he should be given an ROC flag as a gift from the nation. Only then would the Taiwanese public be convinced that the Ma government is not just paying lip service with taxpayers’ money.
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
Since leaving office last year, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has been journeying across continents. Her ability to connect with international audiences and foster goodwill toward her country continues to enhance understanding of Taiwan. It is possible because she can now walk through doors in Europe that are closed to President William Lai (賴清德). Tsai last week gave a speech at the Berlin Freedom Conference, where, standing in front of civil society leaders, human rights advocates and political and business figures, she highlighted Taiwan’s indispensable global role and shared its experience as a model for democratic resilience against cognitive warfare and
The diplomatic spat between China and Japan over comments Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made on Nov. 7 continues to worsen. Beijing is angry about Takaichi’s remarks that military force used against Taiwan by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” necessitating the involvement of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces. Rather than trying to reduce tensions, Beijing is looking to leverage the situation to its advantage in action and rhetoric. On Saturday last week, four armed China Coast Guard vessels sailed around the Japanese-controlled Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known to Japan as the Senkakus. On Friday, in what
RSS