Formosan black bear travails
Recently, a Sky1 English TV series featured coverage of the Great Wall of China as one of the Seven Wonders of the World. At one site near the Great Wall, the program presented a bear enclosure that featured a number of Asian black bears — close cousins of the Formosan black bear in blood and appearance.
Not normally a fan of any kind of zoo or enclosure for wild animals, the sight of these bears in a barren pit begging for food from tourists both upset me and immediately raised in my mind a comparison with the treatment of pandas at Taipei Zoo.
The pandas at Taipei Zoo have an indoor and outdoor enclosure, lots of bamboo and a stylized design that supposedly makes them “feel at home.” Nothing like that exists for the cousins of the Formosan black bears. They get a sand pit with some climbing equipment and food thrown at them by tourists. The difference in treatment is like that of the Hilton and the average squat.
This differential treatment of the bears can also serve as a clear political analogy. Taiwanese are the black bears, locked in a barren enclosure they can’t get out of (the Republic of China [ROC] constitutional polity), being thrown scraps by tourists (purchasing visits by Chinese delegations), while the pandas — Chinese officials such as Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) — are given five-star VIP treatment (hiding, confiscating and destroying ROC flags to avoid hurting the Chinese people’s feelings).
The arrival of the pandas was supposed to signify warming relations between Taiwan and China, but the truth of Beijing’s real attitude to Taipei is seen in its treatment of the close cousins of our protected indigenous species — for Chinese officials, Taiwanese should be constrained and appeased and have no real long-term concessions offered to them.
If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wants to posit former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) acquittal from a set of bribery charges as a reason for Taiwanese not to vote for the Democratic Progressive Party, then surely the treatment of the endangered cousins of the Formosa black bears by Chinese while at the same time President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration bends over backwards to please China should be a good reason for voters to not believe anything the government says about Taiwan-China (read KMT-Chinese Communist Party or Chinese Taipei-People’s Republic of China) relations and to vote for a genuinely pro-Taiwan party instead.
Finally, isn’t it high time we ditched Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) as the “Father of the Nation” and instead called for the Formosan black bear (and the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin while we’re at it) to become the national symbols of the independent Taiwanese nation? Perhaps then, this myopic and ultra-Chinese nationalist KMT government will finally understand that Taiwanese do not want to be re-Sinicized into some imagined, imported and imposed “Greater China.”
BEN GOREN
Taichung
A reform to Ma’s liking
There has been talk recently of “judicial reform.” If this comes to pass, I have a suggestion: Perhaps the Presidential Office should inform the courts beforehand of its preferred outcome in high-profile trials and judges could simply state in the published decision whether it was “respected” by the national leadership, or if it rather buttressed the need for further judicial reform. This would save journalists and readers alike a lot of time.
PETER DEARMAN
Sindian
Belief protects A-bian
Dear President A-bian,
May peace be with you!
It was a pleasure to have seen and talked to you this morning.
Lately, I have had an urge to share with you some words. I believe the Lord wants to communicate to you through me with these words. God wants you to be blind.
“God will lead the blind through a way they do not know. God will guide them on paths they have not known.”
I hope these words will become the source for your consolation, strength and hope.
I was deeply sorry and sad to hear about your final verdict. However, I thought afterward: “God’s ways are higher than our ways and God’s thoughts are higher than our thoughts.”
Through this, I have been comforted. Although we don’t know what the final outcome will be, I beg you to “Trust in the almighty God and believe in Him with all your heart and all your might.”
Our Lord is always right. Although you can’t see it, the Holy Spirit does exist like the air we breathe; the air will make us alive if we breathe. By the same token, the Holy Spirit will lead us in every situation if we just allow it to enter our hearts. This is faith, not religion.
Lastly, please remain calm and use your heart to read God’s words — Isaiah 42 and 43, as I have, and let God speak to you directly.
May God be with you and your family!
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS