I have been thinking about the future of Taiwan.
First, let me take the story of a house as an example — the ancestral home of the current owner. The story begins not long after the end of World War II when waves of Chinese took refuge in Taiwan. The homeowner, taking pity on a refugee family that couldn’t find shelter, allowed them to stay in the house. Little did he know then that the refugees would live there for more than 60 years. During this period, the guest family, behaving as if they were the new masters, did whatever they pleased in the house. They helped themselves to food, used whatever household items they liked and even slept in the owner’s bed, forcing him to sleep on the floor.
The relationship between the two families was basically confrontational in nature. There were times, of course, when the tension eased. The guests, for instance, occasionally took the owner’s children out for a treat or to play, for which the children were always very grateful. Similarly, the owner himself was always happy when he thought he had won an argument. Essentially, however, the two families under the same roof fought and quarreled incessantly.
Please think about this carefully: Isn’t the only way to solve this problem — and for the owner to regain control of his house — is to remove the refugee family?
The thought of my next true story always makes me terribly sad. It happened in 1968 when my late husband accepted an invitation to work for the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which was to dispatch him to Malaysia. He was all ready to go with his passport and letter of appointment in hand, waiting for an airline ticket and a UN-issued transportation expense voucher. After two weeks of waiting, he was surprised to receive a letter from the FAO reassigning him from Malaysia to another country.
The FAO apologized, but I was deeply saddened to learn that the reason behind the reassignment was that Taiwan was not an internationally recognized country — and that is the root cause of the tragedy of the Taiwanese.
I think about the 1994 Qiandao Lake Incident in China, in which 24 Taiwanese were murdered. At that time, the Chinese government dealt with the incident indifferently, and the government in Taiwan did not lift a finger to protect its people, forcing the victims’ families to seek justice themselves.
In 1990, a Japanese student, Iguchi Mariko, went missing in Taiwan. Her countrymen and government demonstrated the utmost concern and provided every possible assistance in helping to search for her. The Japanese girl and the Taiwanese victims were treated very differently by their respective governments. The contrast couldn’t have been more stark.
The status of Taiwan as a nation-state remains undetermined, which is the main reason the international community holds it in disregard. That is a tragedy for Taiwanese. It is imperative that we have a country of our own that is properly recognized by the world. However, is the Republic of China a country? If so, why is it that the international community denies us the right to participate in its activities? Privately, yes, we are allowed space to deal with international friends, but when it comes to official businesses, we are either pushed to one side or excluded altogether.
I’m hopeful that my compatriots will sit down, calmly ponder the future of our beloved land and work together to establish our own country, so that we may have happy days ahead. My concluding thought is this: We urgently need a country to rely on and protect us. This is the voice of the Taiwanese people!
Yang-Liu Hsiu-Hwa is a Taiwan-based writer.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS