At the opening ceremony of the Tokyo International Film Festival on Oct. 23, the head of the Chinese delegation, Jiang Ping (江平), adopted the swagger of a “communist bandit,” demanding that the Taiwanese delegation should have its title changed to “Chinese Taipei” or “Taiwan, China” and be merged with the Chinese delegation.
This was certainly not, as members of the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) have claimed, an isolated incident. Rather, it is the grave consequence of accepting the so-called “one China” principle. All China is doing is cashing the check that Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wrote.
Of course, Taiwanese condemn Jiang’s rudeness and China’s arrogance. All the more worthy of condemnation, though, is the Ma administration for its bungling incompetence in failing to insist that Taiwan’s sovereignty belongs to its people and instead accepting the “one China” principle that means Taiwan is a part of China. If this principle is accepted, it leaves no leeway for saying that the Republic of China (ROC) is a sovereign state, or that Taiwan is a sovereign state, or that the nation’s sovereignty lies with its people.
Nonetheless, even before the Tokyo film festival spat was over, bureaucrats from the Ma administration chimed in with an old lie that has become a joke after being repeated so many times in the past 60 years. As a Government Information Office (GIO) press release about the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) dispute put it: “The mainland remains within the constitutionally defined territory of the Republic of China. So, of course, we cannot voice any disagreement with the mainland authorities’ claim that the Diaoyutai Islands are China’s national territory.”
Put simply, this means that “one China” means the ROC. It really takes a convoluted mind and a great deal of nerve to say such things and keep a straight face. If it were true that the ROC was the one, genuine China and that its territory extends to all of China, then the government headed by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) in Beijing would be a bogus one, or at best a local government. In that case, Frank Chen (陳志寬), director of the GIO’s Department of Motion Pictures, who headed the Taiwanese delegation to the Tokyo film festival, could have told Jiang Ping to change his delegation’s title to “Chinese mainland” and enter the ceremony directly behind the ROC delegation.
If the ROC is the real China, then when Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) came to Taiwan he should have been arrested as a “communist bandit” and locked up in Tucheng (土城) together with independence advocate, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). So why, in contrast, did we see Ma ordering ROC flags to be hidden away during Chen Yunlin’s visit and not complaining when the Chinese envoy addressed him as plain “you” instead of calling him President Ma?
Nowhere else in the world does anyone accept silly notions like “China is part of the ROC,” “China is part of Taiwan” or “the People’s Republic of China is part of the ROC.” As far as Taiwanese are concerned, the most important thing is to insist that Taiwan is not part of China.
No one understands the KMT’s lies better than the KMT itself. On Nov. 23, 1949, former Shanghai mayor Wu Kuo-chen (吳國楨), who had fled to Taiwan, confided to then-US consul-general in Taipei John MacDonald that Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) had written off China after Guangzhou fell to the communists and that Chiang’s most recent visit to Chongqing had been to preside over the China’s “burial service.”
That “burial service” took place six decades ago. Does Ma really think anyone still believes the old lies?
James Wang is a media commentator in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Delegation-level visits between the two countries have become an integral part of transformed relations between India and the US. Therefore, the visit by a bipartisan group of seven US lawmakers, led by US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul to India from June 16 to Thursday last week would have largely gone unnoticed in India and abroad. However, the US delegation’s four-day visit to India assumed huge importance this time, because of the meeting between the US lawmakers and the Dalai Lama. This in turn brings us to the focal question: How and to what extent