Elections are cominG up this month both in the US and Taiwan. In the US, voters go to the polls today, while voters in Taiwan will have an opportunity to vote for the mayors of five special municipalities on Nov. 27.
In both countries the elections are likely to change the political landscape significantly: In the US, the continuing high unemployment rate and dissatisfaction with US President Barack Obama’s stimulus packages have led to the “Tea Party” revolt and a resurgence of the Republican opposition. The Republicans seem set to regain a majority in the House of Representatives and may even gain a majority in the Senate.
In Taiwan, the political atmosphere is similarly affected by the continuing high joblessness rate, but voter dissatisfaction is also driven by concerns that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration’s opening to China is leaving Taiwan vulnerable to political pressure from Beijing, which seems determined to push Taipei into an economic embrace leading to eventual unification.
The pushback against these policies, as well as a strong emphasis on good governance and local concerns, may lead to a victory for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in three or four of the five races, a significant comeback after its severe losses in the 2008 legislative and presidential elections.
These elections will thus lead to major changes in the balance of power in both countries: In the US, the Obama administration will have to deal with a Congress that is likely to assert its positions much more strongly than the Congress as presently composed. Past experience has actually shown that it is good for Taiwan if Congress is controlled by a party that is different from the party in power in the administration.
In the present situation, if the Republicans win a majority in the House, this means that Representative Illeana Ros-Lehtinen is likely to become chairperson of the Foreign Affairs Committee if she is re-elected in her Florida district. She has been a staunch supporter of Taiwan, urging the US government to move forward with the sale of F-16 fighter jets to Taiwan and criticizing the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) signed between the Ma administration and China as a “Trojan Horse.”
On the Taiwan side, a significant victory by the DPP will mean that the Ma administration will have to slow down its overtures toward China. It will mean that the government will have to be more in tune with public opinion on sensitive issues such as trade and other relations with its giant neighbor. It will also mean that it needs to take a firmer position in countering China’s coercive measures, whether it is the continuing missile buildup by China or brazen moves to force Taiwan to attend the Tokyo International Film Festival under names that imply that Taiwan is subjugate to China.
So, in the short and medium term the upcoming elections look to benefit US-Taiwan relations. However, on both sides a lot more needs to be done to bring all major political forces to work in the direction of the longer-term goal of normalizing relations between Taiwan and the outside world.
The present policies came into being in the 1970s and do not reflect the present-day reality that Taiwan is a free and democratic country that deserves a better deal. Instead of perpetuating the nation’s political isolation, we need to bring it into the fold, so that Taiwan and its people can play their rightful role as a member of the international community.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS