Elections are cominG up this month both in the US and Taiwan. In the US, voters go to the polls today, while voters in Taiwan will have an opportunity to vote for the mayors of five special municipalities on Nov. 27.
In both countries the elections are likely to change the political landscape significantly: In the US, the continuing high unemployment rate and dissatisfaction with US President Barack Obama’s stimulus packages have led to the “Tea Party” revolt and a resurgence of the Republican opposition. The Republicans seem set to regain a majority in the House of Representatives and may even gain a majority in the Senate.
In Taiwan, the political atmosphere is similarly affected by the continuing high joblessness rate, but voter dissatisfaction is also driven by concerns that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration’s opening to China is leaving Taiwan vulnerable to political pressure from Beijing, which seems determined to push Taipei into an economic embrace leading to eventual unification.
The pushback against these policies, as well as a strong emphasis on good governance and local concerns, may lead to a victory for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in three or four of the five races, a significant comeback after its severe losses in the 2008 legislative and presidential elections.
These elections will thus lead to major changes in the balance of power in both countries: In the US, the Obama administration will have to deal with a Congress that is likely to assert its positions much more strongly than the Congress as presently composed. Past experience has actually shown that it is good for Taiwan if Congress is controlled by a party that is different from the party in power in the administration.
In the present situation, if the Republicans win a majority in the House, this means that Representative Illeana Ros-Lehtinen is likely to become chairperson of the Foreign Affairs Committee if she is re-elected in her Florida district. She has been a staunch supporter of Taiwan, urging the US government to move forward with the sale of F-16 fighter jets to Taiwan and criticizing the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) signed between the Ma administration and China as a “Trojan Horse.”
On the Taiwan side, a significant victory by the DPP will mean that the Ma administration will have to slow down its overtures toward China. It will mean that the government will have to be more in tune with public opinion on sensitive issues such as trade and other relations with its giant neighbor. It will also mean that it needs to take a firmer position in countering China’s coercive measures, whether it is the continuing missile buildup by China or brazen moves to force Taiwan to attend the Tokyo International Film Festival under names that imply that Taiwan is subjugate to China.
So, in the short and medium term the upcoming elections look to benefit US-Taiwan relations. However, on both sides a lot more needs to be done to bring all major political forces to work in the direction of the longer-term goal of normalizing relations between Taiwan and the outside world.
The present policies came into being in the 1970s and do not reflect the present-day reality that Taiwan is a free and democratic country that deserves a better deal. Instead of perpetuating the nation’s political isolation, we need to bring it into the fold, so that Taiwan and its people can play their rightful role as a member of the international community.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS