Looking back at major social events in Taiwan over the last century, I believe that late Yilan County commissioner Chen Ding-nan’s (陳定南) decision to not allow Formosa Petrochemical Corp to build the sixth naphtha cracker in his county had a great impact on the environment and the residents in that area. It was an historic event to which some additional thought should be given.
At the time, many officials spoke up in favor of Formosa Plastics Group when the government was making the environmental impact assessment of the plant, but they failed to examine the group’s environmental record both at home and abroad. In addition, they did not review Taiwan’s environmental protection standards to find out if they were perhaps too lax or whether law enforcement was accurate.
Still, in the face of the high compensation offered by Formosa Plastics Group, Chen made his view very clear when he said that compensation was not the issue, but rather it was whether or not the plant would be allowed, because from the perspective of national land utilization, Yilan was not an appropriate site for the plant.
Albert Einstein once said: “Not everything that can be counted counts and not everything that counts can be counted.”
Chen insisted that economic development and national income were not the only indexes that counted and that Yilan should be a clean place with clean air, mountains and water. This is the reason why Yilan, 20 years later, can produce Kavalan Whisky there.
If we now look at towns and villages around where the sixth naphtha cracker plant ended up being constructed, in Yunlin County, the plant brought with it pollution, fires and toxic gas leaks, threatening and harming the health of local residents. Today, almost all the teachers and students at the surrounding schools need to wear facemasks in class.
What should we do now? Should the plant be relocated or the schools? Perhaps the best choice for Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬), as she faces problems from the plant’s pollution, is to look back at how Chen handled the case: Compensation is not an issue; the issue is whether the plant can be relocated.
Chan Chang-chuan is a professor at National Taiwan University’s College of Public Health
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
RSS