In recent weeks, on anniversaries marking the war of resistance against Japan and the Japanese defeat of Aboriginal fighters in the Wushe Incident, as well as in his Double Ten National Day address, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has not missed the opportunity to rub a little dirt in the wounds left by World War II. From the horse’s mouth, we heard how Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) troops defeated the Japanese. Ma touts the KMT “victory” over the Japanese as a turning point in history.
In what history book did the president read that the KMT defeated the Japanese? Yes, the Japanese lost World War II, but their defeat was brought about by the Allied Powers, and mainly the US. Chinese troops played a role against the Japanese, but as the KMT had retreated as far inland as they could go, there wasn’t much they could do to stop the bulk of the Japanese imperial army. Some academics even say the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in between skirmishes with the KMT, did more to resist the Japanese than the KMT, thus winning the hearts and minds of the Chinese populace.
So, why is Ma rewriting history?
Could it be because the enemy of your enemy is your friend? Many Chinese, and especially the CCP, have never forgiven the Japanese, in some cases rightfully, for the atrocities the imperial army brought down upon their country. The Rape of Nanking is just one horrible instance in which even Nazi officials stationed in the city were flabbergasted by the bloodshed.
It’s not uncommon in China to hear or see open hostility toward Japan. Many popular movies portray the Japanese as dogs. Just take a look at the Bruce Lee (李小龍) movie Fist of Fury for an example. However, in this type of popular portrayal, even worse than the Japanese themselves are the Chinese who work for them. They are considered traitors to their motherland, worse than worms and worthy of complete destruction.
That sentiment is alive and thriving in China.
In Taiwan, however, there is a much different view of the Japanese. Despite taking Taiwan as the spoils of war in 1895, Japan quickly worked to build the island’s infrastructure, seeking to turn it into an integral part of the Japanese empire. Even though Ma dismissed the Japanese building efforts in a speech at Taipei Zhongshan Hall on Monday to mark Retrocession Day — a day marking the end of Japanese rule in Taiwan — the rest of Taiwan remembers it differently.
The Japanese built roads, railroads, schools, hospitals, ports and government buildings. In fact, many of the KMT’s early development projects were simply continuations of work begun by the Japanese, such as the Central Cross-Island Highway. The Japanese unified the island, which had been divided by simmering conflict between Hoklo-speaking Taiwanese and Aborigines, established industries and educated the populace. This is something that the Chinese had never done for Taiwan. The Japanese brought modernity, even if it was at the point of a gun.
Ma wants to forget all this in the rush to cozy up with his anti-Japanese bedfellows, the CCP. But Taiwanese are smarter, and their memories go deeper than that. Some people here, especially the ones who identify themselves fully as Chinese, will jump onto that bandwagon and trumpet the Chinese “victory” over the Japanese. However, most will remember their grandparents singing Japanese songs, take their shoes off at the doors to their house and appreciate their Japanese connections.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS