Suggestion for Ma
The international community and most people in Taiwan have concluded that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) cares more for China than he does for Taiwan, as former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has alleged.
If Ma and his administration want to prove this wrong and dispute a recent Associated Press report, they should write an open letter to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) to be published in the New York Times or the Washington Post which might read something like this:
Dear President Hu:
I believe that the majority of the people of Taiwan will agree to political dialogue between China and Taiwan under the following conditions:
1. China must release all political prisoners, including Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) and his fellow dissidents;
2. China must carry out political reform and adopt a multiparty system;
3. China must draft a new constitution that should incorporate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
4. China must strive to -preserve the languages and cultures of minority groups and grant them full autonomy on education and local affairs;
5. China must accept the historical facts about Taiwan and respect the right of its people to determine their own future by way of referendum.
JIM CHUNG
Southfield, Michigan
Open question to Washington
Dear Honorable AIT Director William Stanton:
I am a 90-year-old Taiwanese housewife. I received a Japanese education from elementary-school through college. I was treated very unfairly and discriminated against by the Japanese authorities because I did not have my own country. Ever since, I have yearned for a country to call my own and that will look after me.
Alas, my dream has yet to become a reality. I often see in the media that your great country, the US, refers to our government officials as “Taiwan authorities” and states openly that, “We do not support Taiwan independence.”
I wonder how you would feel if you were me?
In the international community, the country that has bullied Taiwan the most has been the People’s Republic of China. That said, only a minority of the populace in such nations as the US, Japan, Germany, the UK and the Netherlands could claim to understand and sympathize with Taiwan, while the majority remain indifferent to its fate.
At the end of World War II, when Japan was defeated, I was at a loss as to why your great nation would provide assistance to the “Republic of China” to gain control of Taiwan — without the consent of the Taiwanese people. That fateful move allowed Taiwanese to suffer through the 228 Massacre, White Terror and the longest period of martial law in human history. It has also made Taiwanese fearful and easily intimidated. To this day, Taiwanese are so politically numb that they live in a contradiction, fruitlessly begging the Ma administration to do this or that.
I am a Christian. Your great nation is also founded on Christian principles. During the presidential inauguration, your president put his hand on the Bible to show his respect for God. Is this tradition just a meaningless formality? Our Lord Jesus Christ is a loving God. I sometimes question where that love is to be found in your great country. I am aware that politics is often heartless, cruel, pragmatic and self-interested. I am begging you, however, to kneel before the Lord and answer my question: Does your great country have a loving heart? I earnestly hope to receive a positive answer, so that this old lady may feel comforted and reassured.
The US federal court has rendered a judgment that Taiwanese are stateless — people without nationality. For over 60 years, Taiwanese have been living in a kind of political prison. While Taiwanese cannot liberate themselves, I — with the few remaining years I have — would love to be the Esther of the Bible and help save them. I hope you will relay my letter to the president of your great nation, Mr Barack Obama. I am hopeful that he will provide assistance to my cause in finding a better future for Taiwan.
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS