Suggestion for Ma
The international community and most people in Taiwan have concluded that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) cares more for China than he does for Taiwan, as former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has alleged.
If Ma and his administration want to prove this wrong and dispute a recent Associated Press report, they should write an open letter to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) to be published in the New York Times or the Washington Post which might read something like this:
Dear President Hu:
I believe that the majority of the people of Taiwan will agree to political dialogue between China and Taiwan under the following conditions:
1. China must release all political prisoners, including Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) and his fellow dissidents;
2. China must carry out political reform and adopt a multiparty system;
3. China must draft a new constitution that should incorporate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
4. China must strive to -preserve the languages and cultures of minority groups and grant them full autonomy on education and local affairs;
5. China must accept the historical facts about Taiwan and respect the right of its people to determine their own future by way of referendum.
JIM CHUNG
Southfield, Michigan
Open question to Washington
Dear Honorable AIT Director William Stanton:
I am a 90-year-old Taiwanese housewife. I received a Japanese education from elementary-school through college. I was treated very unfairly and discriminated against by the Japanese authorities because I did not have my own country. Ever since, I have yearned for a country to call my own and that will look after me.
Alas, my dream has yet to become a reality. I often see in the media that your great country, the US, refers to our government officials as “Taiwan authorities” and states openly that, “We do not support Taiwan independence.”
I wonder how you would feel if you were me?
In the international community, the country that has bullied Taiwan the most has been the People’s Republic of China. That said, only a minority of the populace in such nations as the US, Japan, Germany, the UK and the Netherlands could claim to understand and sympathize with Taiwan, while the majority remain indifferent to its fate.
At the end of World War II, when Japan was defeated, I was at a loss as to why your great nation would provide assistance to the “Republic of China” to gain control of Taiwan — without the consent of the Taiwanese people. That fateful move allowed Taiwanese to suffer through the 228 Massacre, White Terror and the longest period of martial law in human history. It has also made Taiwanese fearful and easily intimidated. To this day, Taiwanese are so politically numb that they live in a contradiction, fruitlessly begging the Ma administration to do this or that.
I am a Christian. Your great nation is also founded on Christian principles. During the presidential inauguration, your president put his hand on the Bible to show his respect for God. Is this tradition just a meaningless formality? Our Lord Jesus Christ is a loving God. I sometimes question where that love is to be found in your great country. I am aware that politics is often heartless, cruel, pragmatic and self-interested. I am begging you, however, to kneel before the Lord and answer my question: Does your great country have a loving heart? I earnestly hope to receive a positive answer, so that this old lady may feel comforted and reassured.
The US federal court has rendered a judgment that Taiwanese are stateless — people without nationality. For over 60 years, Taiwanese have been living in a kind of political prison. While Taiwanese cannot liberate themselves, I — with the few remaining years I have — would love to be the Esther of the Bible and help save them. I hope you will relay my letter to the president of your great nation, Mr Barack Obama. I am hopeful that he will provide assistance to my cause in finding a better future for Taiwan.
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS