Sometimes one can’t help but wonder whether President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), in the dead of night, ever finds his conscience stirring as he reflects on words he used during the day.
In a speech titled “Reform, Innovation and Pursuit of Justice,” Ma, in his Double Ten National Day address, pledged to set up a human rights consultative committee under the Presidential Office in a bid to improve human rights in Taiwan.
“I promise that with regard to any issue pertaining to social justice, environmental justice or judicial integrity, we will take active steps to meet the expectations of our people,” Ma said. He also vowed that the government would work “to further promote the development and protection of human rights and basic freedoms.”
The words may look pretty in print and sound impressive, but who was Ma trying to fool? In case he hasn’t realized, it was under his presidency these past two years that Taiwanese suffered the most severe infringements of their individual human rights in the past decade.
The public wasn’t blind, and it wasn’t an illusion when they witnessed police using excessive force to stop people expressing themselves with Republic of China (ROC) national flags during Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin’s (陳雲林) visit in November 2008.
Nor were Taiwanese having delusions when they saw people dragged from their afternoon tea simply because they were at the same hotel where Chen was staying or people questioned by police on the streets for wearing T-shirts bearing the words “Taiwan is my country” and pulled over for riding scooters decorated with Tibetan flags.
The public wasn’t deaf, either — it wasn’t make--believe when young girls screamed after their fingers were injured by police officers who forcibly wrested ROC flags out of their hands; nor was it untrue that a music store was forced by police to stop playing the Song of Taiwan.
More instances of human rights under Ma: The Wild Strawberry Student Movement was formed after the Ma government used excessive force against the public; increasing allegations surfaced of government meddling in the Public Television Service; and the government demonstrated dubious intentions during the controversial name-change of the Taiwan Human Rights Memorial to Jingmei Cultural Park.
In view of all these disturbing reports of how public rights, freedom of speech and freedom of the press have been eroded by government action, Ma has only himself to blame when Taiwanese take his pledges with a grain of salt.
Ma trumpets the fact that his administration in May last year ratified two UN human rights covenants — the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. However, China also signed those covenants, yet it continues to brutalize its people, so Ma should stop patting himself on the back and take concrete actions to win people’s respect.
As Ma so well put it in his National Day speech: “Democracy and freedom have come to define the spirit of Taiwan.”
The public is waiting to see what Ma has to offer as he revamps his human rights protection pledges. Otherwise, it will only be a matter of time before the public looks back on Ma’s establishment of the so-called human rights consultative committee as one of the biggest ironies of his administration.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS