Is it any surprise anymore that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-controlled government is holding secret meetings with top Chinese security officials?
Since former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) signed an agreement on cooperation between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2005, nothing has been on the level. Backroom politics, secret agreements, obfuscation and cover-ups now define relations between these former enemies, now bedfellows. That’s why it comes as little surprise that Chinese Vice Minister of Public Security Chen Zhimin (陳智敏) visited Taiwan for a week last month to discuss who-knows-what with top Taiwanese officials, who remain anonymous because nobody in power wants anybody in the opposition to know just what’s going on.
The ramifications of secret meetings like this run deep. Former Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) chairman Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) hit the nail on the head when he said that discussions between Chinese security chiefs and the Mainland Affairs Council, Ministry of Justice and Coast Guard Administration could be focused on combating “terrorism,” a euphemism that could easily be used to describe those who support independence, or those who disagree with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) headlong push into unification. Once a secret agreement between the two sides’ security apparatuses is signed, it wouldn’t be hard to cooperate electronically to track and pressure pro--independence bloggers, activists and politicians.
If meetings like this become the norm, as Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) said he fears, then the public won’t know when their actions — which might have been legal in the past — will suddenly be considered dangerous or illegal.
Another suspicious coincidence is that Chen’s visit came at roughly the same time as the showdown between Japan and China on sovereignty over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台). The ongoing dispute directly involves the coast guards of all three nations that claim the islands — China, Japan and Taiwan. Setting the backdrop to these simmering nationalist tensions is unprecedented cooperation between the coast guards of Taiwan and China — an hours-long rescue drill off Kinmen Island, a place where the two sides used to do battle. In addition, the Taiwanese government allowed activists to board vessels leaving from Taiwanese territory to protest against Japan’s claim to the islands, escorting them with coast guard vessels. During this ugly confrontation, who steps across the Taiwan Strait to hold closed-door, secretive meetings with Taiwan’s coast guard? None other than one of the prime architects of the security crackdowns in Beijing, Hong Kong and Macau, China’s second-most powerful cop.
Why all this security cooperation? Isn’t the agreement on extradition of cross-strait criminals, stowaways and illegal immigrants — the Kinmen Agreement — that Taiwan signed with China 20 years ago enough? Why should the two sides meet secretly to strengthen cross-strait security, or hold so-called “peaceful exchanges”? The answer is because there will be a lot more people in Taiwan who disagree vocally with unification than there were in Hong Kong or Macau, and the groundwork needs to be laid. Once it becomes painfully obvious that the KMT and CCP intend to jointly unify the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, they’re going to have to act quickly to suppress all internal dissent and to unify their outward postures to discourage the involvement of Japan and the US. The talks surrounding these issues are not something they want to make public.
All this shows that things are a lot further along in the unification race than we had thought. Given the way the KMT and CCP are acting, unification seems like a done deal, with cross-strait markets and now mutual security apparatuses making the plunge before the politicians jump into the honeymoon suite.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
RSS