Myth of electric cars
Several models of electric car will enter the US market this fall. People tend to believe that electric cars are green or environmentally friendly, but this is not entirely true.
Electric cars do not necessarily reduce carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxide emissions in comparison to gasoline cars. These pollutant oxides are sometimes referred as COx, SOx and NOx, respectively. The COx may also include carbon monoxide and the SOx sulfur trioxide.
Most of the electricity used in the US is generated from coal. Three parts of coal energy can produce only one part of electric energy. Because of the high cost, carbon dioxide is not removed at all from flue gas in coal-fired power plants except in a few research, development and demonstration projects.
Carbon dioxide emissions from coal are the highest, followed by oil, natural gas, regenerable fuels and nuclear energy. Thus, an electric car using electricity generated from coal emits more carbon dioxide than a gasoline car does.
In coal-fired power plants, sulfur dioxide is generally removed from flue gas. In oil refineries, crude oil is also desulfurized when making gasoline. As a result, sulfur dioxide emissions are virtually zero for both electric and gasoline cars.
Nitrogen oxides are seldom removed from coal flue gas, again because of the increased cost, although processes like selective catalytic reduction, which uses ammonia to reduce nitrogen oxides into nitrogen, are commercially available.
An electric car does not emit nitrogen oxides when the car is driven, but coal-fired power plants generating electricity do cause nitrogen oxide emissions. A gasoline car has a catalytic converter to take care of both nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide emissions.
It is well known that sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides cause acid rain and the latter is also responsible for smog, but the environmental impact of carbon dioxide on global warming is still controversial. Many people believe that Typhoons Morakot and Fanapi were caused by cyclical climate change rather than the increased concentration of carbon dioxide in the air. If this diagnosis is correct, a carbon tax is the wrong approach for climate change and will only serve to increase the cost of energy with little or no benefit in terms of controlling climate change.
The effects of carbon dioxide need to be clarified scientifically and independently of politics. If carbon dioxide is not an issue, electric cars can make use of the enormous US coal reserves and foreign oil imports can be reduced. At the same time, further research is still needed into fast battery charging, increased battery capacity and reduced vehicle costs.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Legal madness
Many people in Taiwan make fun of, deplore and condemn the judicial process here. The judiciary has certainly had a number of disappointing “outcomes” recently.
Just today, I read about a 14 year old child who was adept enough to use a government run Web site, copy a report and then paste it onto a different site (which he registered in another country ... smart move) (“Teenager faces jail term for spreading false information,” Sept. 24, page 2).
The notice was spread through social media sites such as Plurk and led many people to read that Typhoon Fanapi would result in schools being closed for a whole year. A prank.
The story went on to say that a captain in the criminal investigation bureau said this teenager faced up to seven years in prison.
Sad, really, when you think that a child molester or rapist received a three-year sentence (and a few months to be correct) in another case that has disturbed quite a few people.
It boggles the mind how judges, prosecutors and others in Taiwan feel that they know how certain crimes should be punished.
If you ask me, 14-year-olds can’t really think about consequences ... they are too busy exploring, learning and having adventures. To throw this kid in jail and have a rapist out in half the time is madness!
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Taipei
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
RSS