Life after Kyoto
As the expiration date for the Kyoto Protocol looms ever closer, environmentalists like George Monbiot will predictably pin much of the blame for the failure of Kyoto on the Chinese government.
They will find themselves in the position of arguing for more regulatory oversight to be imposed on businesses by one of the world’s most desperate, least trustworthy and most abusive governments.
Moreover, in the event of further natural disasters over the next decade, it is quite likely that the government in Beijing and its subordinate parochial departments may struggle to cope, and the resulting human and environmental costs will be staggering.
Perhaps, however, an alternative frame of mind may afford an opportunity for environmentalists along with human rights advocates and entrepreneurs.
The commercial development of clean, efficient and independent energy and water technologies is a relatively high-tech affair, but one which entrepreneurs in Taiwan, with their wealth of high-end research, development and engineering expertise, could be well placed to successfully exploit and eventually introduce to Chinese consumers and businesses located in China.
Worthy of particular attention are nanoscale water filters which eradicate all known viruses and bacteria by filtering water at the molecular level, and radioisotope batteries, which generate electricity from the temperature differential across a magnetic field caused by radiation from small and easily shielded quantities of plutonium 238.
Both of these technologies offer the possibility of sustainable, portable, cheap and network-independent supply and re-supply of both clean water and electricity.
There are, however, several institutional barriers to entry into this potential market.
The domestic market demand for both water and energy in Taiwan is distorted by a combination of monopoly supply, farming and manufacturing subsidies and, most notably, the inclusion of private externalities on the list of public liabilities.
Were a courageous set of politicians to attempt to reform this list so that manufacturers, farmers and domestic consumers had to deal with real prices, then the demand for clean, efficient and independent water and energy technologies would improve significantly.
Even without such political retreat, it is likely that market demand for these technologies will improve over time as more money is wasted on environmentally destructive dams and centrally networked renewable energy sources that deliver energy on only the slightest of margins.
The commercial development of such technologies in Taiwan and their appropriately scaled introduction in China would not only be a boon for Taiwanese business, Taiwanese consumers and the environment in Taiwan, but also for Chinese businesses, Chinese consumers and China’s environment.
Not only that, but flourishing Taiwanese enterprises in this field would enable people in both Taiwan and China to recover more easily from natural disasters when demand for energy and clean water hit instant peaks.
These technologies would also undermine a not-insignificant arm of serial human-rights abuser, the People’s Republic of China
MICHAEL FAGAN
Tainan
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS