After crafting the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement’s (ECFA) strategic framework around “one China on both sides [of the Taiwan Strait]” and economic cooperation, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has followed a path for unification with Taiwan stated by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) in his six-point statement.
The CCP has also attempted to use the ECFA model to expand its political and economic approach to its cultural approach.
It is clear the CCP is now taking this approach with Taiwan.
There is not much difference between the CCP’s “peaceful unification” policy as stated in Hu’s six-point statement in 2008 and in former Chinese president Jiang Zemin’s (江澤民) eight-point statement from 1995. However, Hu has accomplished what Jiang failed to do, and the key lies in the rare window of opportunity that occurred during Hu’s presidency.
The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) return to power in 2008 has allowed Beijing to cooperate actively with its “good friends” in the KMT. Through several cross-strait agreements, it has managed to lock in the direction of Taiwan’s development.
The ECFA model is a typical example. It has not only restricted Taiwan, it also effectively excluded all democratic monitoring mechanisms and has become the model for China’s future Taiwan strategy.
The best example is Chinese Minister of Culture Cai Wu’s (蔡武) suggestion during his trip to Taiwan this month that the two sides should take a cue from the ECFA and sign a cultural cooperation agreement.
This suggestion gave an indication that the focus of the next stage of KMT-CCP cooperation will be to connect cross-strait culture and promote Chinese culture as a foundation for building a wider Chinese society.
As this trend continues to develop, more issues between Taiwan and China will be brought to the negotiation table. If such talks do take place, Taiwanese must be alert and have a basic understanding of China’s negotiation trickery in order to monitor such talks appropriately.
Most importantly, we need to keep a close eye on China’s “good friends” in Taiwan to ensure that Taiwan’s national interests are not sacrificed to meet their vested interests.
The Chinese are obsessed with personal connections. They are adept at cultivating, utilizing and pressuring people in the rival camp, who are friendly to China, to reach its goals in a negotiation. The most famous example are talks in the 1970s on normalizing Sino-US relations.
Through China’s friends, including Henry Kissinger, the US secretary of state under former US presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, and Zbigniew Brzezinski, former US president Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor, Beijing reached its goals as the US cut ties and abolished agreements with Taiwan, withdrew its troops stationed in Taiwan and established diplomatic ties with China.
Another key issue is the question of how to break through the government’s exclusion of Taiwan’s democratic monitoring mechanisms.
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The Taipei District Court on Nov. 1 agreed to extend the detention of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for his suspected involvement in corruption involving a real-estate project during his time as Taipei mayor. Different voices are beginning to emerge from within the TPP about how to respond to their extended leaderless situation. Following a string of scandals coming to light since early August, including the TPP’s misreporting of election campaign finances and Ko’s alleged corruption related to the Core Pacific City redevelopment project, Ko on Aug. 29 announced he would take a three-month leave of absence from
RSS