After crafting the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement’s (ECFA) strategic framework around “one China on both sides [of the Taiwan Strait]” and economic cooperation, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has followed a path for unification with Taiwan stated by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) in his six-point statement.
The CCP has also attempted to use the ECFA model to expand its political and economic approach to its cultural approach.
It is clear the CCP is now taking this approach with Taiwan.
There is not much difference between the CCP’s “peaceful unification” policy as stated in Hu’s six-point statement in 2008 and in former Chinese president Jiang Zemin’s (江澤民) eight-point statement from 1995. However, Hu has accomplished what Jiang failed to do, and the key lies in the rare window of opportunity that occurred during Hu’s presidency.
The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) return to power in 2008 has allowed Beijing to cooperate actively with its “good friends” in the KMT. Through several cross-strait agreements, it has managed to lock in the direction of Taiwan’s development.
The ECFA model is a typical example. It has not only restricted Taiwan, it also effectively excluded all democratic monitoring mechanisms and has become the model for China’s future Taiwan strategy.
The best example is Chinese Minister of Culture Cai Wu’s (蔡武) suggestion during his trip to Taiwan this month that the two sides should take a cue from the ECFA and sign a cultural cooperation agreement.
This suggestion gave an indication that the focus of the next stage of KMT-CCP cooperation will be to connect cross-strait culture and promote Chinese culture as a foundation for building a wider Chinese society.
As this trend continues to develop, more issues between Taiwan and China will be brought to the negotiation table. If such talks do take place, Taiwanese must be alert and have a basic understanding of China’s negotiation trickery in order to monitor such talks appropriately.
Most importantly, we need to keep a close eye on China’s “good friends” in Taiwan to ensure that Taiwan’s national interests are not sacrificed to meet their vested interests.
The Chinese are obsessed with personal connections. They are adept at cultivating, utilizing and pressuring people in the rival camp, who are friendly to China, to reach its goals in a negotiation. The most famous example are talks in the 1970s on normalizing Sino-US relations.
Through China’s friends, including Henry Kissinger, the US secretary of state under former US presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, and Zbigniew Brzezinski, former US president Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor, Beijing reached its goals as the US cut ties and abolished agreements with Taiwan, withdrew its troops stationed in Taiwan and established diplomatic ties with China.
Another key issue is the question of how to break through the government’s exclusion of Taiwan’s democratic monitoring mechanisms.
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS