It was supposed to be the start of a brave new world in which the customer was king. However, the teenage boy in the barber’s chair stared at his reflection, aghast and almost crying.
“What have you done?” he asked, caressing uneven clumps on a shorn scalp.
The barber, a forty-something man with a grubby white coat, put down the scissors, lit a cigarette and shrugged.
“Looks OK to me. Don’t know what you’re on about,” he said.
The young customer examined his head from different angles, each worse than the last.
“It’s like ...” — he struggled for words — “a tennis ball. A bald bloody tennis ball.”
The barber took another drag and put out his hand.
“Forty pesos [US$1.50]. Have a nice day,” he said.
The scene on Neptuno Street, a crumbling, sun-bleached quarter near downtown Havana, was a taste of Cuba’s challenge in transforming its socialist economy with a sweeping privatization drive.
Authorities announced on Monday last week that they will lay off more than 1 million state employees in the island’s biggest economic shake-up since the 1960s. Cuts begin immediately, with 500,000 jobs due to go by March. Loosened controls on private enterprise will, it is hoped, jumpstart the private sector and turn former public workers into entrepreneurs.
“Our state cannot and should not continue maintaining companies, productive entities, services and budgeted sectors with bloated payrolls [and] losses that hurt the economy,” said the official Cuban labor federation, which announced the news.
“Job options will be increased and broadened with new forms of non-state employment, among them leasing land, co-operatives and self-employment, absorbing hundreds of thousands of workers in the coming years,” it said.
In fact, the changes started in April with a pilot scheme to privatize barbers and hairdressers. Formerly state employees — about 85 percent of the labor force works for the communist state — they were told to take over their own salons, charge whatever they wanted, pay tax — and court customers.
As the barber showed, providing good customer service, let alone expanding market share, is an alien concept to many accustomed to receiving the same pittance wage regardless of job performance.
“I don’t want to take over this place,” Luis, the barber, who preferred not to give his surname, said. “How do I know it’ll make a profit? How do I pay suppliers?”
Like it or not, those are questions many more Cubans will soon be asking after receiving their pink slips. The authorities, according to a 26-page party document leaked to the Associated Press, have a plan for them to raise rabbits, paint buildings, make bricks, collect garbage and pilot ferries across Havana’s bay.
Some of those let go will be urged to form private cooperatives, others will be directed towards foreign-run companies and joint ventures and others will be encouraged to set up their own small businesses.
The communist party document admitted lack of experience, insufficient skill levels and low initiative could sink new enterprises.
“Many of them could fail within a year,” it said.
After half a century of official certitude about its socialist course, Cuba is entering new waters. Its final destination remains unclear.
“A hybrid is evolving which can’t be said to be any one thing,” said Julia Sweig, a Cuba expert at the Council on Foreign Relations think tank. “We’re seeing a uniquely Cuban transition, but within the global economy.”
Unemployment last year was officially 1.7 percent, but with average monthly salaries of only US$20, supplemented by a ration book and free healthcare and education, many Cubans make minimal efforts, prompting an old joke: “They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work.”
Last week’s announcement — widely reported across state media — has been trailed since Cuban President Raul Castro succeeded his brother, former Cuban president Fidel Castro, in 2008.
“We have to erase forever the notion that Cuba is the only country in the world in which people can live without working,” he told the national assembly last month.
The decades-old US embargo — a crippling, punitive measure — could no longer be blamed for all the island’s woes, he said.
It was no longer possible to protect and subsidize salaries on an unlimited basis and cuts will affect all government sectors, the labor federation said.
“Losses that hurt our economy are ultimately counterproductive, creating bad habits and distorting worker conduct,” it said.
Workers at the ministries of sugar, public health, tourism and agriculture will be let go first, according to the communist party document. The last in line will be those at civil aviation and the ministries of foreign relations and social services.
To ease the pain, authorities hope to energize the stunted private sector by encouraging Cubans to raise animals, grow vegetables, drive taxis, repair vehicles, make sweets and dried fruit and seek building work.
Left-wingers abroad may feel let down by the cuts, but Cuban officials believe the thriving black market is an indicator that the private sector will soak up surplus labor. Such consensus would contrast with Britain, Ireland and Greece, among others, where cutbacks have triggered vocal protests.
One Havana-based Western diplomat was less sanguine about Cuba’s response, especially as there were simultaneous cuts in subsidies for food, cigarettes and other products which people used to barter.
“People knew this was coming, but now it’s here, it’s real and they’re worried. Bosses will get rid of the least productive employees, the ones who don’t work or show up for work. The type of people who may lack the get up and go to start a business. People wonder if there will be a rise in crime or social protests,” the diplomat said.
Europe was enduring its own economic travails, but was at least accustomed to unemployment, the diplomat said.
“People here aren’t used to being threatened with losing their job. They may complain their salary is only US$15 a month, but that’s US$15 more than nothing,” the diplomat added.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
RSS