Chinese steel mills and mobile phone factories are being idled and thousands of homes in one area are doing without electricity as local governments order power cuts to meet energy-saving targets set by Beijing.
Rolling blackouts and enforced power cuts are affecting key industrial areas. The prosperous eastern city of Taizhou has turned off street lights and ordered hotels and shopping malls to cut power use. In Anping County, southwest of Beijing, an area known as China’s wire-manufacturing capital, thousands of factories and homes have endured day-long blackouts over the past two weeks.
“We can’t meet deadlines for some orders and will have to pay penalties,” said Han Hongmai (韓宏邁), general manager of Anping’s Jintai Metal Wire Co.
“At home, we can’t use the toilet” on blackout days because of a lack of power for water pumps, Han said.
While the US and Europe struggle with flagging economies, the power outages are symptomatic of China’s torrid growth and officials’ capricious use of their powers to meet the authoritarian government’s goals.
China’s economic expansion, which hit 10.3 percent in the last quarter, blew holes in government efforts to curb surging energy demand, pollution and emissions of climate-changing greenhouse gases. Beijing told local leaders to clamp down and stepped up pressure by sending inspectors to see the order was being carried out.
‘BLACKMAIL’
“You could say local governments are trying to blackmail the central government: If you order me to do something I can’t deliver, I will pass on the pressure to ordinary people,” said Yang Ailun (楊愛倫), a spokeswoman for Greenpeace China.
The Cabinet’s planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, scolded Anping officials for the household power cuts. The provincial government issued an order to see that all homes have power.
However, it’s not the first time something like this has happened.
In 2007, gasoline shortages disrupted the economy after refiners cut production in response to price controls. The next year, parts of China shivered through blackouts during a bitter cold winter after the government froze power prices, prompting utilities to cut expenses by letting coal stockpiles run low.
This year’s power cuts began after Beijing announced last month that an energy-efficiency campaign had suffered a setback as a stimulus-fueled building boom drove growth in steel, cement and other heavy industry.
Beijing’s plans call for cutting energy intensity, or energy used per unit of economic output, by 20 percent from 2006 levels by this year. The World Bank says China uses up to twice the energy per unit of output as the US, Japan and other economies. Chinese officials say energy use is 3.4 times the world average.
Energy intensity fell by 14.4 percent by the end of last year after thousands of antiquated steel mills and other factories were forced to close, the government says, but it crept back up by 0.9 percent in the first half of this year.
Beijing reacted by ordering 2,087 steel and cement mills and other factories with poor environmental controls to close. The Cabinet stepped up pressure on local leaders by sending inspectors to 18 of China’s 32 provinces and major regions to enforce efficiency.
“They understand that if they fail to meet this target it could potentially cast doubt, not just internationally, but domestically, about whether China is serious about tackling its emissions,” Yang said.
Yang said environmentalists welcome moves to close antiquated factories because that improves overall efficiency, but she said temporary blanket cuts come at a high social cost and the government should be taking more long-term steps, such as changing energy pricing to encourage conservation.
“What they are doing now is relying too much on harsh administrative orders,” she said.
In some ways, the power cuts are backfiring.
Han said his wire factory coped by purchasing its own generator, so it still uses power — but from a source that might be dirtier and less efficient.
Energy is politically sensitive for Beijing, which is trying to clean up the battered Chinese environment and rein in growing demand for imported oil and gas, which it sees as a strategic weakness.
Booming China passed the US last year as the world’s top energy consumer, according to the International Energy Agency — a report that Beijing angrily rejected.
EMISSIONS GROWTH
China is also the biggest source of climate-changing greenhouse gases. As a developing country, it is not bound by UN climate treaties, but has pledged to curb emissions growth, though it says the US and other advanced economies should do more.
Some of China’s biggest companies have been hobbled by the campaign, which is cutting production at a time when Beijing needs to create jobs to sustain a rebound from the global crisis.
Baosteel Group, a major steelmaker, announced on Sept. 1 it was shutting down a 2-million-tonne-a-year blast furnace in Ningbo, a port city south of Shanghai.
“The suspension could last over three months, causing a loss of 180,000 tonnes of steel a month,” the facility’s deputy director, Huang Ming, said in a company statement.
Zhejiang Province, where Ningbo is located, failed to achieve even a 1 percent improvement in energy intensity in the first half of this year, a provincial government notice said.
It said this year’s target is a 3.2 percent improvement.
In Jiangsu Province, north of Shanghai, factories that make mobile phones, computers and other electronics have been ordered to shut down for five days every two weeks, Chinese media reported.
In Hebei Province, authorities have imposed energy quotas on factories and threatened violators with fines and a cutoff of power and water supplies, state-run newspaper Shanghai Securities News said.
It said the curbs hit as steelmakers were preparing for a peak production season.
“People in the industry are heartbroken,” the newspaper said.
Additional reporting by Bonnie Cao and Ji Chen
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS