Is the government’s money being well spent? One can’t help but ask the question given the recent string of reports on just how free-handed the government has been with taxpayers’ money.
On Tuesday, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wong Chin-chu (翁金珠) said that the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) had asked for a marketing and promotions budget of NT$178 million (US$5.5 million) for next year. That figure is a five-fold increase from last year’s NT$32 million.
Reports also emerged yesterday that Taoyuan International Airport Co — the company that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications is launching on Nov. 1 to take over management and operation of the airport — plans to spend NT$323.4 million renovating the airport’s bathrooms from next year through 2013.
Then there was the announcement from the Ministry of the Interior yesterday that the individual who came up with the slogan “Children are our most precious treasures” for its birth promotion slogan competition would receive a cash award of NT$1 million.
The list of financial largesse wouldn’t be complete without mentioning the whopping — and overpriced, as Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) has admitted — sum the city government has spent on flowers and other items for the Xinsheng Overpass’ beautification project and the Taipei International Flora Exposition.
Against the backdrop of mounting national debt — with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration racking up a deficit of NT$1.42 trillion — the way the government spends taxpayers’ money has left many wondering whether it knows how to prioritize public needs.
For instance, rather than spending the bulk of its funds on advertising and promoting the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), wouldn’t it be better spent holding a referendum and letting the public have its say? Ma has brushed off the need to hold an ECFA plebiscite, saying it would be too costly. But wouldn’t a budget of NT$178 million devoted solely to publicity be just as pricey — if not for Ma, at least to many members of the public?
As for renovating the airport’s bathrooms, with a total of 90 toilets in the two terminals, does the government need to spend NT$3.6 million per toilet to improve the situation? As Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) rightfully said, the point is not how much money is being spent, but whether the management has the heart and the will to keep the facilities and services on par.
As for the slogan competition, would “Children are our most precious treasures” encourage more people to have babies? It’s unlikely. Although NT$1 million might not seem like much in the eyes of the government, to the ordinary person it is money that could have been better spent elsewhere.
The number of elementary and junior high school students unable to afford school lunches surged to 226,000 last year. Imagine how many youngsters could have their stomachs filled if the government knew how to better appropriate funds to care for them. Or how about using some of the money to fund schools struggling to send their players to compete abroad?
When a government fails in setting its priorities, it’s the public who suffers.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS