Is the government’s money being well spent? One can’t help but ask the question given the recent string of reports on just how free-handed the government has been with taxpayers’ money.
On Tuesday, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wong Chin-chu (翁金珠) said that the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) had asked for a marketing and promotions budget of NT$178 million (US$5.5 million) for next year. That figure is a five-fold increase from last year’s NT$32 million.
Reports also emerged yesterday that Taoyuan International Airport Co — the company that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications is launching on Nov. 1 to take over management and operation of the airport — plans to spend NT$323.4 million renovating the airport’s bathrooms from next year through 2013.
Then there was the announcement from the Ministry of the Interior yesterday that the individual who came up with the slogan “Children are our most precious treasures” for its birth promotion slogan competition would receive a cash award of NT$1 million.
The list of financial largesse wouldn’t be complete without mentioning the whopping — and overpriced, as Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) has admitted — sum the city government has spent on flowers and other items for the Xinsheng Overpass’ beautification project and the Taipei International Flora Exposition.
Against the backdrop of mounting national debt — with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration racking up a deficit of NT$1.42 trillion — the way the government spends taxpayers’ money has left many wondering whether it knows how to prioritize public needs.
For instance, rather than spending the bulk of its funds on advertising and promoting the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), wouldn’t it be better spent holding a referendum and letting the public have its say? Ma has brushed off the need to hold an ECFA plebiscite, saying it would be too costly. But wouldn’t a budget of NT$178 million devoted solely to publicity be just as pricey — if not for Ma, at least to many members of the public?
As for renovating the airport’s bathrooms, with a total of 90 toilets in the two terminals, does the government need to spend NT$3.6 million per toilet to improve the situation? As Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) rightfully said, the point is not how much money is being spent, but whether the management has the heart and the will to keep the facilities and services on par.
As for the slogan competition, would “Children are our most precious treasures” encourage more people to have babies? It’s unlikely. Although NT$1 million might not seem like much in the eyes of the government, to the ordinary person it is money that could have been better spent elsewhere.
The number of elementary and junior high school students unable to afford school lunches surged to 226,000 last year. Imagine how many youngsters could have their stomachs filled if the government knew how to better appropriate funds to care for them. Or how about using some of the money to fund schools struggling to send their players to compete abroad?
When a government fails in setting its priorities, it’s the public who suffers.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS