Over the past 15 years, the slipshod policy of establishing a large number of colleges and universities has resulted in a rapid expansion of Taiwan’s higher education. In recent years, some private universities have experienced a shortage of enrolled students. A study by the National Policy Foundation showed that the main reason for this is the declining birthrate. Minister of Education Wu Ching-chi (吳清基) said that if admissions continue to shrink by the current 2 percent per year, there will be a shortage of 70,000 students by 2021, which would mean about 60 universities would be likely to disappear.
Although these figures are not yet cold hard facts, they have already created a panic in the minds of many private university operators. As a result, they are taking precautions that are turning these figures into self-fulfilling prophecies, thus making their universities look as if they are about to disappear. In addition, they are making the mistake of blaming poor enrollment on the declining birthrate.
The fact is, however, that there is not a very clear relationship between the falling enrollment figures in recent years and the declining birth rate, a look at the nation’s population structure reveals. The most serious birthrate decline will occur 10 years from now. Taiwan’s annual population statistics, which are divided into five-year age groups, show that the declining birthrate is worst in the below-10 age groups, where there is a shortage of 600,000 school children. Thus, the real concern should be what will happen 10 years from now. Consequently, we can make the claim that the declining birthrate is not the main cause of the current problem.
It is wrong to blame the student shortage on the declining birthrate in an attempt to avoid responsibility for the poor management of some private universities. How else can we explain the expansion of some private schools where registration rates are almost 100 percent, while enrolment at other schools continues to drop to the point where less than half of all places are filled?
Several universities made media headlines for having the lowest registration rates in 2008. A shared characteristic of these schools were the poor results of their departments and institutes in professional evaluations. Students even mocked them by making up slogans using the names of the bottom five schools.
The directorial boards at some of these schools were very dictatorial and meetings on school affairs existed on paper only, their decision-making and financial situations were not transparent, administrative leaders strove for personal gain and recruited relatives and friends and faculty engaged in power struggles either openly or privately. These schools were on the receiving end of a lot of negative media reporting. Most of these schools no longer participate in the joint admission program and instead recruit students by themselves. These schools have now been replaced by a new set of schools at the bottom. Several of these are private universities established by religious groups.
In addition to some unfavorable external factors, the biggest problem this new set of bottom schools is their internal deterioration or even collapse. Originally, some smaller private universities had unique characteristics, but in recent years they have made compromises in a flirt with empty neoliberal discourse, causing them to expand rapidly based on market-oriented governance principles. Making cost-effectiveness the supreme goal has caused the core values of these schools to be hollowed out.
Without the direction provided by core values, a school’s staff become tools acting without faith and passion, which is evident by way they only care about the number of enrolled students, ignoring where they come from. Teaching equipment, accommodation, student activity facilities and public transportation meet only the most basic requirements. The governing principle for staff numbers and school organizational structure is to downsize everything and make everyone’s extra skills stretch as far as possible. The lack of dignity has deprived staff of meaning and morale, causing the quality of teaching and services to decline. Internal and external school evaluations adhere strictly to rigid performance evaluations with a careless opportunist attitude focused on quantity rather than quality. Newly fashionable departments added in the name of market orientation remain at the bottom of the list because they were established in such a haphazard manner.
Unless the current private universities with poor enrolment rates can leave the market logic behind and redefine themselves and return to their excellent traditions and core values to attract students, they will inevitably collapse completely. If they do collapse, they will be gone long before declining birthrate becomes a real problem.
Chou Ping is the chairman of the Department of Applied Sociology at Nanhua University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS