Pre-emptive strike option
Mark Stokes pointed out the usefulness of submarines in the defense of Taiwan (“Taiwan’s debate on submarine expansion resurfaces,” Aug. 23, page 3).
The so-called “porcupine strategy” proposed by US Naval War College professor William Murray for Taiwan’s defense was purely defensive and reactive. For a small country like Taiwan, which could be overwhelmed quickly by the massive opening salvos of a surprise attack, defense strategy must include “pre-emption” and “retaliation” capabilities. As former US secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld said in his farewell speech at the Pentagon, “Weakness is provocative.”
Only by making an attack on Taiwan prohibitively costly is it possible to prevent war. Under this concept, submarines, as well as mobile missiles and multi-mission-capable Blackhawk helicopters, are an absolute necessity.
Submarines, not necessarily large ones (in fact, small ones may work better and be less costly for Taiwan), could be rotated for patrol and surveillance, and pre-emptively deployed to mine Chinese naval harbors. Though carrying only a smaller complement of missiles, when aimed at a few large, important targets like coastal cities or large dams, these could be sufficient to deter an invasion.
Taiwan should seek to build its own submarines. This would require infrastructure development and cooperation with private industry. Though difficult, these kinds of economic activities are exactly what Taiwan needs to rejuvenate its economy, especially heavy and high-tech industries, and this could also keep these industries in Taiwan as the foundation for further domestic industrial upgrading. Taiwanese legislators, could find it difficult to resist industrial development and job creation in their constituencies.
With submarines, mobile missiles and Blackhawk helicopters, Taiwan could build up its active defense capabilities and deter attack.
However, given President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) goal of eventual unification and the friendly Taiwan-China relations, the above “wishes” would be very difficult to realize, even when the increasing cross-strait military imbalance in Beijing’s favor is evident.
SEBO KOH,
Publisher of Taiwan Tribune,Strongsville, Ohio
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
RSS